Literature DB >> 15819348

The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement.

Gordon J Christensen1.   

Abstract

Impressions for crowns and fixed prostheses could be better. I have offered several suggestions to improve their quality. None of the suggestions is difficult or time-consuming. The result of making better impressions will be greater longevity for the resultant restorations and happier patients, dentists and laboratory technicians.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15819348     DOI： 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN： 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  13 in total

1.  Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques.

Authors:  Júnio S Almeida e Silva; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Élito Araújo; Michael Stimmelmayr; Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira; Jan-Frederik Güth
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Christine Keul; Michael Stimmelmayr; Florian Beuer; Daniel Edelhoff
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.

Authors:  Jan-Frederik Güth; Cornelius Runkel; Florian Beuer; Michael Stimmelmayr; Daniel Edelhoff; Christine Keul
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Impression evaluation and laboratory use for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; Mark S Litaker; Ashley J George; Scott Durand; Sepideh Malekpour; Don G Marshall; Cyril Meyerowitz; Lauren Carter; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model.

Authors:  So-Yeun Kim; So-Hyoun Lee; Seong-Keun Cho; Chang-Mo Jeong; Young-Chan Jeon; Mi-Jung Yun; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Clinical Acceptability of the Internal Gap of CAD/CAM PD-AG Crowns Using Intraoral Digital Impressions.

Authors:  Tae-Gyung Kim; Sungtae Kim; Hyunmin Choi; Jae-Hoon Lee; Jae-Hong Kim; Hong-Seok Moon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of the fit of cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression techniques.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Yun; Young-Chan Jeon; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Accuracy of Proximal and Occlusal Contacts of Single Implant Crowns Fabricated Using Different Digital Scan Methods: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Xi Ren; Keunbada Son; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Effect of the Crystallization Process on the Marginal and Internal Gaps of Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Kim; Seunghan Oh; Soo-Hyuk Uhm
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method.

Authors:  Yoo-Geum Jeong; Wan-Sun Lee; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.904
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.