Literature DB >> 1581904

Metabolic properties and photosensitizing responsiveness of mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 in a mouse tumor model.

A Ferrario1, D Kessel, C J Gomer.   

Abstract

A mouse mammary tumor model was used to evaluate metabolic properties of the photosensitizer mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 (NPe6) and to determine the optimal time interval between drug administration and light treatment for effective photodynamic therapy (PDT). Photosensitizer metabolism was evaluated by comparing tissue distribution patterns of NPe6 having 14C atoms positioned on either the tetrapyrrole ring or on the aspartyl residue. High performance liquid chromatographic analysis of photosensitizer extracted from tumor tissue was also obtained as a function of time after drug administration. NPe6 distribution in tissue samples and pharmacological calculations of area under the curve were similar for both forms of [14]NPe6. Likewise, metabolic contaminants of NPe6 were not detected by high performance liquid chromatographic analysis following extraction of the photosensitizer from tumor tissue. Maximal in vivo PDT effectiveness was achieved when light treatments were started within 2 h of drug injection. PDT effectiveness was decreased by 50% when light treatments were initiated 6 h after drug injection and was abolished with a 12-h interval between NPe6 injection and light exposure. Responsiveness to NPe6-mediated PDT was correlated with photosensitizer levels in the plasma but not in tumor tissue. These results show that NPe6 was not metabolized following in vivo administration and that the responsiveness of NPe6 mediated PDT was associated with vascular clearance of the photosensitizer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1581904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  7 in total

1.  How to access photodynamic therapy for bile duct carcinoma.

Authors:  Atsushi Nanashima; Hajime Isomoto; Takafumi Abo; Takashi Nonaka; Tomohito Morisaki; Junichi Arai; Katsunori Takagi; Ken Ohnita; Hiroyuki Shoji; Shigetoshi Urabe; Takemasa Senoo; Goshi Murakami; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-03

2.  Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: Part three-Photosensitizer pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, tumor localization and modes of tumor destruction.

Authors:  Ana P Castano; Tatiana N Demidova; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.631

3.  Myocardial necrosis depth prediction during extracellular photosensitization reaction of talaporfin sodium by defined index using fluorescence measurement.

Authors:  M Takahashi; A Ito; T Kimura; S Takatsuki; K Fukuda; T Arai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Compartmental targeting for mTHPC-based photodynamic treatment in vivo: Correlation of efficiency, pharmacokinetics, and regional distribution of apoptosis.

Authors:  Julie Garrier; Aude Bressenot; Susanna Gräfe; Sophie Marchal; Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster; François Guillemin; Lina Bezdetnaya
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  In vivo confocal fluorescence imaging of the intratumor distribution of the photosensitizer mono-L-aspartylchlorin-e6.

Authors:  Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Uptake and retention of the photosensitizer mono-L-asparthyl chlorine e6 in experimental malignant glioma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Matsumura; Jiro Akimoto; Jo Haraoka; Katsuo Aizawa
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Effects of photodynamic therapy using mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 on vessels and its contribution to the antitumor effect.

Authors:  K Saito; N Mikuniya; K Aizawa
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.