Literature DB >> 15818697

Evidence of radiographic benefit of treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no clinical improvement: a detailed subanalysis of data from the anti-tumor necrosis factor trial in rheumatoid arthritis with concomitant therapy study.

J S Smolen1, C Han, M Bala, R N Maini, J R Kalden, D van der Heijde, F C Breedveld, D E Furst, P E Lipsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between inflammation and joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have not responded clinically to treatment.
METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 54 in clinical variables and measures of radiographic progression were compared between patients who received infliximab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks) plus methotrexate (MTX) and those who received MTX plus placebo in the Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in RA with Concomitant Therapy trial.
RESULTS: At week 54, patients who did not show 20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20 nonresponders) while receiving infliximab plus MTX exhibited mild but statistically significant improvement in clinical variables, including the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) (P < 0.001), tender joint count (P = 0.014), swollen joint count (P < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level (P < 0.001). Whereas the clinical and CRP changes among ACR20 nonresponders to infliximab plus MTX were small and much lower than among ACR20 responders to this treatment, radiographic progression among ACR20 nonresponders to infliximab plus MTX was significantly inhibited (P < 0.001) compared with ACR20 nonresponders to MTX plus placebo. Radiographic progression was much greater in patients receiving MTX plus placebo than in patients receiving infliximab plus MTX, irrespective of ACR response status (mean change in modified Sharp/van der Heijde score 6.0 in ACR20 responders and 7.2 in ACR20 nonresponders in the MTX plus placebo-treated group, versus 0.1 in ACR20 responders and 1.2 in ACR20 nonresponders in the infliximab plus MTX-treated group). Furthermore, among patients who were ACR20 nonresponders through week 54, patients who were DAS nonresponders at weeks 30 and 54, and patients without any improvement in individual clinical variables, those receiving infliximab plus MTX still demonstrated inhibition of structural damage that was statistically significant compared with inhibition in patients who received MTX plus placebo (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Even in patients without clinical improvement, treatment with infliximab plus MTX provided significant benefit with regard to the destructive process, suggesting that in such patients these 2 measures of disease are dissociated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15818697     DOI: 10.1002/art.20982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  124 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Kurt Redlich; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Comparison of different biologic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after failure of the first biologic therapy.

Authors:  Christoph Strehblow; Guenther Haberhauer; Peter Fasching
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05

3.  Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2006.

Authors:  D E Furst; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; G R Burmester; P Emery; E C Keystone; M H Schiff; P L C M van Riel; M E Weinblatt; M H Weisman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007.

Authors:  D E Furst; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; G R Burmester; J Sieper; P Emery; E C Keystone; M H Schiff; P Mease; P L C M van Riel; R Fleischmann; M H Weisman; M E Weinblatt
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  [Measurement instead of scoring in rheumatology: new quantitative imaging and processing methods in radiology].

Authors:  P Peloschek; C Müller-Mang; K Friedrich; G Langs; R Donner; A Valentinitsch; F Kainberger
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Characteristics and outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients who started biosimilar infliximab.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Soo-Kyung Cho; Dam Kim; Soyoung Won; Chan-Bum Choi; So-Young Bang; Seung-Jae Hong; Hyoun Ah Kim; Eun-Mi Koh; Hye-Soon Lee; Chang-Hee Suh; Dae-Hyun Yoo; Sang-Cheol Bae
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Utility and direct costs: ankylosing spondylitis compared with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  S M M Verstappen; J W G Jacobs; D M van der Heijde; Sj van der Linden; C M Verhoef; J W J Bijlsma; A Boonen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The role of T cells in osteoporosis, an update.

Authors:  Wen Zhao; Yuying Liu; Catherine M Cahill; Wenlu Yang; Jack T Rogers; Xudong Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2009-05-20

9.  Activated protein C inhibits proliferation and tumor necrosis factor α-stimulated activation of p38, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and Akt in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sohel M Julovi; Kaitlin Shen; Kelly Mckelvey; Nikita Minhas; Lyn March; Christopher J Jackson
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 10.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of using infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Astrid Wiens; Cassyano Januário Correr; Rafael Venson; Mônica Cavichiolo Grochocki; Michel Fleith Otuki; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.