Literature DB >> 15818042

Evaluation of sympathetic blockade after intrathecal and epidural lidocaine in rats by laser Doppler perfusion imaging.

J Adolphs1, T K Schmitt, D K Schmidt, S Mousa, M Welte, H Habazettl, M Schafer.   

Abstract

The widespread use of neuraxial anaesthesia increases the need for animal models to evaluate therapeutic prospects, mechanisms and risks of this technique. As a methodological prerequisite, we characterised the sympathetic blockade after different modes of neuraxial anaesthesia with regard to segments supplying the splanchnic region. Under haemodynamic monitoring, lidocaine 2% or saline were infused via intrathecal (10 microl), lumbar epidural (10 and 30 microl) or thoracic epidural (10 and 30 microl) catheters. Segmental spread of neuraxially infused local anaesthetic was assessed using methylene blue. Mean arterial blood pressure decreased more severely after neuraxial lidocaine in thoracic epidural (10 and 30 microl) compared to high-volume (30 microl anaesthesia animals. Determination of the sympathetic blockade by means of laser Doppler perfusion imaging was restricted to the paws due to a higher density of subcutaneous blood vessels as compared to the abdominal wall (mean +/- SD: 3.93 +/- 0.06 vs. 1.35 +/- 0.05/384 mm(2), p < 0.05). Only high-volume (30 microl) lumbar and thoracic epidural anaesthesia (10 and 30 microl) increased skin perfusion in both hind and front paws. This extensive sympathetic blockade was demonstrated to include splanchnic segments using thermography. Segmental spread of methylene blue did not closely correspond to laser Doppler findings and should be interpreted as minimum rather than exact epidural spread of local anaesthetic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15818042     DOI: 10.1159/000083148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg Res        ISSN: 0014-312X            Impact factor:   1.745


  1 in total

1.  [Increase in skin surface temperature in spinal anesthesia. Predictive value for probability of surgical tolerance].

Authors:  A Penno; M Arumugam; G Antweiler; T Laubert; J Habermann; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.