BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether a short course of anthracycline containing chemotherapy followed by high dose therapy with autologous stem-cell support improves disease-free and overall survival as compared with conventional, anthracycline containing chemotherapy, in patients with primary breast cancer and four or more histologically involved lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighty one patients entered into a randomised clinical trial were allocated to receive standard, conventional treatment (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-FEC for six cycles) or FEC for three cycles followed by high dose therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin and stem cell rescue (HDT). To be eligible, patients had to be free of overt metastatic disease and be < or =60 years of age. Analyses were according to intention to treat. RESULTS: At a median follow up of 68 months, 118 patients have experienced a relapse or death from breast cancer (62 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 56 in the conventional FEC arm) and a total of 100 patients have died (54 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 46 in the conventional FEC arm). No significant difference was observed in relapse-free survival [hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.74-1.52, p = 0.76] or overall survival [hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.80-1.75, p = 0.40]. Five patients died from treatment related causes, three as a consequence of HDT and two in the conventional FEC arm. CONCLUSIONS: At the present time, no benefit has been observed from replacing three cycles of conventional chemotherapy with the HDT regimen described here. Patients should continue to receive conventional chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess whether a short course of anthracycline containing chemotherapy followed by high dose therapy with autologous stem-cell support improves disease-free and overall survival as compared with conventional, anthracycline containing chemotherapy, in patients with primary breast cancer and four or more histologically involved lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighty one patients entered into a randomised clinical trial were allocated to receive standard, conventional treatment (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide-FEC for six cycles) or FEC for three cycles followed by high dose therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin and stem cell rescue (HDT). To be eligible, patients had to be free of overt metastatic disease and be < or =60 years of age. Analyses were according to intention to treat. RESULTS: At a median follow up of 68 months, 118 patients have experienced a relapse or death from breast cancer (62 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 56 in the conventional FEC arm) and a total of 100 patients have died (54 in the FEC followed by HDT arm and 46 in the conventional FEC arm). No significant difference was observed in relapse-free survival [hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.74-1.52, p = 0.76] or overall survival [hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.80-1.75, p = 0.40]. Five patients died from treatment related causes, three as a consequence of HDT and two in the conventional FEC arm. CONCLUSIONS: At the present time, no benefit has been observed from replacing three cycles of conventional chemotherapy with the HDT regimen described here. Patients should continue to receive conventional chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
Authors: A VanderWalde; W Ye; P Frankel; D Asuncion; L Leong; T Luu; R Morgan; P Twardowski; M Koczywas; R Pezner; I B Paz; K Margolin; J Wong; J H Doroshow; S Forman; S Shibata; G Somlo Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: I Vaxman; R Ram; A Gafter-Gvili; L Vidal; M Yeshurun; M Lahav; O Shpilberg Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Donald A Berry; Naoto T Ueno; Marcella M Johnson; Xiudong Lei; Jean Caputo; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; William P Peters; Robert C Leonard; William E Barlow; Martin S Tallman; Jonas Bergh; Ulrike A Nitz; Alessandro M Gianni; Russell L Basser; Axel R Zander; R Charles Coombes; Henri Roché; Yutaka Tokuda; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John P Crown; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Marco Bregni; Taner Demirer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tessa G Steenbruggen; Lars C Steggink; Caroline M Seynaeve; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Maartje J Hooning; Agnes Jager; Inge R Konings; Judith R Kroep; Wim M Smit; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan D Bins; Sabine C Linn; Michael Schaapveld; Judy N Jacobse; Flora E van Leeuwen; Carolien P Schröder; Harm van Tinteren; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabe S Sonke; Jourik A Gietema Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Claude Sportès; Seth M Steinberg; David J Liewehr; Juan Gea-Banacloche; David N Danforth; Daniele N Avila; Kelly E Bryant; Michael C Krumlauf; Daniel H Fowler; Steven Pavletic; Nancy M Hardy; Michael R Bishop; Ronald E Gress Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: L Boudin; A Gonçalves; R Sabatier; J Moretta; P Sfumato; P Asseeva; D Livon; F Bertucci; J-M Extra; C Tarpin; G Houvenaeghel; E Lambaudie; A Tallet; M Resbeut; H Sobol; E Charafe-Jauffret; B Calmels; C Lemarie; J-M Boher; P Viens; F Eisinger; C Chabannon Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: R E Payne; N L Hava; K Page; K Blighe; B Ward; M Slade; J Brown; D S Guttery; S A A Zaidi; J Stebbing; J Jacob; E Yagüe; J A Shaw; R C Coombes Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 7.640