Literature DB >> 15817188

Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks.

A Ennaceur1, S Michalikova, A Bradford, S Ahmed.   

Abstract

The present study, examines some issues in the measure and analysis of behavior in animals. Two strains of rats of both genders were used to illustrate and discuss these issues. We examined to what extent various behavioral measures reflect different or identical emotional or cognitive factors and, how sensitive are the various parameters of a task to differences between strains and genders. Wistar and Lister males and females rats were tested in an anxiety test then in the object recognition task followed by the object location task. Taking advantage of a simple computer program it is possible to: (1) record several parameters of theses tasks and examine the pattern of animal responses toward novelty and/or familiarity; (2) examine whether different measurements of the same response would reflect anxiety response to novelty and, can they discriminate between novelty and familiarity responses to objects; and (3) examine if changes in the pattern of animal responses are reflected by these measurements and, whether anxiety or discrimination is evident mainly during the first minute of the test. The results on the anxiety test show that different measures of the same response proved concordant and revealed significant differences between Lister males and Wistar males. Lister males approached more frequently an object and spent more time on an object in each approach compared to Wistar males in the first 5 min of test and in the total 10 min. They have also shorter latencies between approaches compared to Wistar males. The examination of performance over different time bins was significant with the measure of frequency. Lister male rats approached less frequently the object in the last 5 min of the test compared to the first 5 min. Their performance, however, did not differ from that of the other groups in this last 5 min. In the memory tasks, the measure of the frequency of approaches suggests that Lister male rats were able to discriminate between novel and familiar objects and, between novel and familiar location of objects. The measure of latency of first approach shows that Wistar female rats were able to discriminate between objects only in the spatial memory test. Discrimination in the object recognition task was observed in the first and second minute, and in the total 3 min sessions. Discrimination in the object location task was observed with the measure of frequency of approaches, in the first minute, and in the total 3 min sessions. Results from the total 3 min sessions were more concordant between the different measures of discrimination than results from separate 1 min bins. The results from the two memory tasks show that novelty prevented habituation to re-exposure to the testing environment. In many cases, novelty increased exploration of the objects in the choice phase compared to the sample phase. However, this lack of habituation or increased exploration in the choice phase is not concordant with most results of discrimination between novelty and familiarity from the same type of measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15817188     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  Sex differences in escalation of methamphetamine self-administration: cognitive and motivational consequences in rats.

Authors:  Carmela M Reichel; Clifford H Chan; Shannon M Ghee; Ronald E See
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Automation of the novel object recognition task for use in adolescent rats.

Authors:  Janelle M Silvers; Steven B Harrod; Charles F Mactutus; Rosemarie M Booze
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  The metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor agonist LY379268 counteracted ketamine-and apomorphine-induced performance deficits in the object recognition task, but not object location task, in rats.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pitsikas; Athina Markou
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Stress Facilitates the Development of Cognitive Dysfunction After Chronic Ethanol Exposure.

Authors:  Ellen M Rodberg; Carolina R den Hartog; Rachel I Anderson; Howard C Becker; David E Moorman; Elena M Vazey
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Sex-specific enhanced behavioral toxicity induced by maternal exposure to a mixture of low dose endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Marissa Sobolewski; Katherine Conrad; Joshua L Allen; Hiromi Weston; Kyle Martin; B Paige Lawrence; Deborah A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.294

6.  Dose-dependent effects of ladostigil on microglial activation and cognition in aged rats.

Authors:  Marta Weinstock; Corina Bejar; Donna Schorer-Apelbaum; Rony Panarsky; Lisandro Luques; Shai Shoham
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Effects of topiramate on ethanol-cocaine interactions and DNA methyltransferase gene expression in the rat prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  V Echeverry-Alzate; E Giné; K M Bühler; J Calleja-Conde; P Olmos; M A Gorriti; R Nadal; F Rodríguez de Fonseca; J A López-Moreno
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Cholinergic Oculomotor Nucleus Activity Is Induced by REM Sleep Deprivation Negatively Impacting on Cognition.

Authors:  Patrícia Dos Santos; Adriano D S Targa; Ana Carolina D Noseda; Lais S Rodrigues; Juliane Fagotti; Marcelo M S Lima
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Inhibition of Nogo-66 receptor 1 enhances recovery of cognitive function after traumatic brain injury in mice.

Authors:  Jing Tong; Weimin Liu; Xiaowei Wang; Xiaodi Han; Ollivier Hyrien; Uzma Samadani; Douglas H Smith; Jason H Huang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Effects of multiparity on recognition memory, monoaminergic neurotransmitters, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).

Authors:  Abbe H Macbeth; Helen E Scharfman; Neil J Maclusky; Claris Gautreaux; Victoria N Luine
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.