W Leidinger1, P Schwinn, H M Hofmann, J N Meierhofer. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, and Intensive Care Unit-Blood Bank, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. werner.leidinger@klinikum-gap.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Patients undergoing eye surgery under regional anaesthesia often require concomitant medication for analgesia and comfort. Remifentanil, with its ultra-short acting-profile, may be useful to reduce pain during retrobulbar nerve block for cataract surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of remifentanil for analgesia during retrobulbar nerve block placement. Ninety patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly divided to receive either remifentanil 0.3 microg kg(-1) (n = 45) or an equivalent volume of saline (n = 45). The injection was administered within 30 s in both groups. Patients rated their amount of pain on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Respiratory frequency, oxygen saturation, cardiac rhythm and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded. RESULTS: The mean visual analogue score in the Remifentanil group was 2.56; it was 5.51 in the Saline group (P = 0.001, U-test). Three patients developed bradycardia and three had PONV in the Remifentanil group. Two patients developed tachycardia and one had PONV in the Saline group. No patient developed respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing retrobulbar block placement for eye surgery, 0.3 microg kg(-1) remifentanil over 30 s significantly reduced their reported pain. In addition, remifentanil did not increase the risk of untoward side-effects.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Patients undergoing eye surgery under regional anaesthesia often require concomitant medication for analgesia and comfort. Remifentanil, with its ultra-short acting-profile, may be useful to reduce pain during retrobulbar nerve block for cataract surgery. METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of remifentanil for analgesia during retrobulbar nerve block placement. Ninety patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly divided to receive either remifentanil 0.3 microg kg(-1) (n = 45) or an equivalent volume of saline (n = 45). The injection was administered within 30 s in both groups. Patients rated their amount of pain on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Respiratory frequency, oxygen saturation, cardiac rhythm and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were recorded. RESULTS: The mean visual analogue score in the Remifentanil group was 2.56; it was 5.51 in the Saline group (P = 0.001, U-test). Three patients developed bradycardia and three had PONV in the Remifentanil group. Two patients developed tachycardia and one had PONV in the Saline group. No patient developed respiratory depression. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing retrobulbar block placement for eye surgery, 0.3 microg kg(-1) remifentanil over 30 s significantly reduced their reported pain. In addition, remifentanil did not increase the risk of untoward side-effects.