Literature DB >> 15814824

Sequence-variant repeats of MUC1 show higher conformational flexibility, are less densely O-glycosylated and induce differential B lymphocyte responses.

Silvia von Mensdorff-Pouilly1, Leo Kinarsky, Katja Engelmann, Stephan E Baldus, René H Verheijen, Michael A Hollingsworth, Vladimir Pisarev, Simon Sherman, Franz-Georg Hanisch.   

Abstract

The human epithelial cancer mucin MUC1 is able to break tolerance and to induce humoral immune responses in healthy subjects and in cancer patients. We recently showed that clusters of sequence-variant repeats are interspersed in the repeat domain of MUC1 at high frequency, which should contribute to the structural and immunological features of the mucin. Here we elucidated the potential effects exerted by sequence-variant repeats on their O-glycosylation. Evidence from in vitro glycosylation with polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferases GalNAc-T1 and GalNAc-T2 in concert with mass spectrometric analyses of in vivo glycosylated MUC1 probes from transiently transfected HEK293 cells indicated reduced glycosylation densities of repeats with three concerted replacements: AHGVTSAPESRPAPGSTAPA. The Pro to Ala replacement in STAPA exerts not only proximal effects on the ppGalNAc-T2 preferred site at -3 and -4, but also more distant effects on the ppGalNAc-T1 preferred site at -15 (TSAPESRPAPGSTAPA). We also examined the conformational changes of MUC1 glycopeptides induced by the concerted DT to ES replacements and revealed a higher conformational flexibility of ES/P peptides compared to DT/P peptides. Differences in conformational flexibilities and in O-glycosylation densities could underlie the observed differential humoral responses in humans. We were able to show that the natural immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to the repeat domain of MUC1 in sera from nonmalignant control subjects are preferentially directed to variant repeat clusters. In contrast, the IgG response in patients with adenocarcinoma shifted to higher frequencies of preferential DTR peptide binding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814824     DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwi058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glycobiology        ISSN: 0959-6658            Impact factor:   4.313


  5 in total

1.  Identification of O-glycosylated decapeptides within the MUC1 repeat domain as potential MHC class I (A2) binding epitopes.

Authors:  Tanja Ninkovic; Leo Kinarsky; Katja Engelmann; Vladimir Pisarev; Simon Sherman; Olivera J Finn; Franz-Georg Hanisch
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Tn glycosylation of the MUC6 protein modulates its immunogenicity and promotes the induction of Th17-biased T cell responses.

Authors:  Teresa Freire; Richard Lo-Man; Sylvie Bay; Claude Leclerc
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Increasing the antigenicity of synthetic tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens by targeting Toll-like receptors.

Authors:  Sampat Ingale; Margreet A Wolfert; Therese Buskas; Geert-Jan Boons
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.164

4.  Single molecule real time sequencing in ADTKD-MUC1 allows complete assembly of the VNTR and exact positioning of causative mutations.

Authors:  Andrea Wenzel; Janine Altmueller; Arif B Ekici; Bernt Popp; Kurt Stueber; Holger Thiele; Alois Pannes; Simon Staubach; Eduardo Salido; Peter Nuernberg; Richard Reinhardt; André Reis; Patrick Rump; Franz-Georg Hanisch; Matthias T F Wolf; Michael Wiesener; Bruno Huettel; Bodo B Beck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Natural and Induced Humoral Responses to MUC1.

Authors:  Silvia Von Mensdorff-Pouilly; Maria Moreno; René H M Verheijen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.