Literature DB >> 15814381

A survey of private sector respirator use in the United States: an overview of findings.

Brent C Doney1, Dennis W Groce, Donald L Campbell, Mark F Greskevitch, William A Hoffman, Paul J Middendorf, Girija Syamlal, Ki Moon Bang.   

Abstract

Limitations of previous surveys of respirator use led the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to undertake a survey of respirator use and practices among U.S. private sector employers. The survey was mailed to 40,002 private sector establishments in August 2001; the responses were used to develop national estimates. Respirator use was required in 4.5% of establishments and for 3.1% of employees. Of the establishments requiring respirator use, 95% used air-purifying respirators and 17% used air-supplied respirators. Manufacturing; mining (including oil and gas extraction); construction; and agriculture, forestry, and fishing had the highest rates of establishment respirator use. Respirators were used most frequently to protect against dust/mist, paint vapors, and solvents. Large percentages of establishments requiring respirator use had indicators of potentially inadequate respirator programs. Of establishments requiring respirator use, 91% had at least one indicator of a potentially inadequate respiratory protection program, while 54% had at least five indicators. The survey findings suggest that large numbers of employers may not follow NIOSH recommendations and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) requirements for the selection and use of respirators, potentially putting workers at risk. The findings will aid efforts to increase the appropriate use of respirators in the workplace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814381     DOI: 10.1080/15459620590949020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  8 in total

1.  Pesticide use, allergic rhinitis, and asthma among US farm operators.

Authors:  Opal Patel; Girija Syamlal; Paul K Henneberger; Walter A Alarcon; Jacek M Mazurek
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 2.  Respirators in Healthcare: Material, Design, Regulatory, Environmental, and Economic Considerations for Clinical Efficacy.

Authors:  Cameron C Young; James D Byrne; Adam J Wentworth; Joy E Collins; Jacqueline N Chu; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2022-04-12

3.  Exploring respiratory protection practices for prominent hazards in healthcare settings.

Authors:  Kerri Wizner; Mahiyar Nasarwanji; Edward Fisher; Andrea L Steege; James M Boiano
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Behavioural interventions to promote workers' use of respiratory protective equipment.

Authors:  Bao Yen Luong Thanh; Malinee Laopaiboon; David Koh; Pornpun Sakunkoo; Hla Moe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  Feasibility Assessment of a New Surveillance Tool for Respiratory Protective Devices Used in U.S. Healthcare.

Authors:  Kerri Wizner; Lewis Radonovich; Allie Bell; Charles Oke; Mary Yarbrough
Journal:  J Int Soc Respir Prot       Date:  2018-07

6.  Does Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Affect Workers' Health?

Authors:  Li-Peng Yao; Ran Tao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-05

7.  Evaluation of Respiratory Protection Program in Petrochemical Industries: Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Authors:  Hadi Kolahi; Mehdi Jahangiri; Haleh Ghaem; Akbar Rostamabadi; Mandana Aghabeigi; Payam Farhadi; Mojtaba Kamalinia
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-05-19

8.  B95: a new respirator for health care personnel.

Authors:  Megan E Gosch; Ronald E Shaffer; Aaron E Eagan; Raymond J Roberge; Victoria J Davey; Lewis J Radonovich
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.918

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.