Literature DB >> 15814350

Measuring the fate of plant diversity: towards a foundation for future monitoring and opportunities for urgent action.

E Nic Lughadha1, J Baillie, W Barthlott, N A Brummitt, M R Cheek, A Farjon, R Govaerts, K A Hardwick, C Hilton-Taylor, T R Meagher, J Moat, J Mutke, A J Paton, L J Pleasants, V Savolainen, G E Schatz, P Smith, I Turner, P Wyse-Jackson, P R Crane.   

Abstract

Vascular plants are often considered to be among the better known large groups of organisms, but gaps in the available baseline data are extensive, and recent estimates of total known (described) seed plant species range from 200000 to 422000. Of these, global assessments of conservation status using International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) categories and criteria are available for only approximately 10000 species. In response to recommendations from the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity to develop biodiversity indicators based on changes in the status of threatened species, and trends in the abundance and distribution of selected species, we examine how existing data, in combination with limited new data collection, can be used to maximum effect. We argue that future work should produce Red List Indices based on a representative subset of plant species so that the limited resources currently available are directed towards redressing taxonomic and geographical biases apparent in existing datasets. Sampling the data held in the world's major herbaria, in combination with Geographical Information Systems techniques, can produce preliminary conservation assessments and help to direct selective survey work using existing field networks to verify distributions and gather population data. Such data can also be used to backcast threats and potential distributions through time. We outline an approach that could result in: (i) preliminary assessments of the conservation status of tens of thousands of species not previously assessed, (ii) significant enhancements in the coverage and representation of plant species on the IUCN Red List, and (iii) repeat and/or retrospective assessments for a significant proportion of these. This would result in more robust Sampled Red List Indices that can be defended as more representative of plant diversity as a whole; and eventually, comprehensive assessments at species level for one or more major families of angiosperms. The combined results would allow scientifically defensible generalizations about the current status of plant diversity by 2010 as well as tentative comments on trends. Together with other efforts already underway, this approach would establish a firmer basis for ongoing monitoring of the status of plant diversity beyond 2010 and a basis for comparison with the trend data available for vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814350      PMCID: PMC1569457          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  6 in total

1.  Threatened biotas: "hot spots" in tropical forests.

Authors:  N Myers
Journal:  Environmentalist       Date:  1988

2.  Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices.

Authors:  S T Buckland; A E Magurran; R E Green; R M Fewster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond.

Authors:  S H M Butchart; A J Stattersfield; J Baillie; L A Bennun; S N Stuart; H R Akçakaya; C Hilton-Taylor; G M Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity.

Authors:  Jonathan Loh; Rhys E Green; Taylor Ricketts; John Lamoreux; Martin Jenkins; Valerie Kapos; Jorgen Randers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis.

Authors:  Catherine H Graham; Simon Ferrier; Falk Huettman; Craig Moritz; A Townsend Peterson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: red list indices for birds.

Authors:  Stuart H M Butchart; Alison J Stattersfield; Leon A Bennun; Sue M Shutes; H Resit Akçakaya; Jonathan E M Baillie; Simon N Stuart; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Use of two population metrics clarifies biodiversity dynamics in large-scale monitoring: the case of trees in Japanese old-growth forests: the need for multiple population metrics in large-scale monitoring.

Authors:  Mifuyu Ogawa; Yuichi Yamaura; Shin Abe; Daisuke Hoshino; Kazuhiko Hoshizaki; Shigeo Iida; Toshio Katsuki; Takashi Masaki; Kaoru Niiyama; Satoshi Saito; Takeshi Sakai; Hisashi Sugita; Hiroyuki Tanouchi; Tatsuya Amano; Hisatomo Taki; Kimiko Okabe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Peter Crane; Andy Dobson; Rhys E Green; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The effect of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species on scientific collections.

Authors:  David L Roberts; Andrew R Solow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The sampled Red List Index for plants, phase II: ground-truthing specimen-based conservation assessments.

Authors:  Neil Brummitt; Steven P Bachman; Elina Aletrari; Helen Chadburn; Janine Griffiths-Lee; Maiko Lutz; Justin Moat; Malin C Rivers; Mindy M Syfert; Eimear M Nic Lughadha
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Incorporating evolutionary history into conservation planning in biodiversity hotspots.

Authors:  Sven Buerki; Martin W Callmander; Steven Bachman; Justin Moat; Jean-Noël Labat; Félix Forest
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency.

Authors:  Félix Forest; Keith A Crandall; Mark W Chase; Daniel P Faith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Quest for adequate biodiversity surrogates in a time of urgency.

Authors:  Félix Forest
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of plants in a chronosequence of Eucalyptus grandis plantations.

Authors:  Pamela E Pairo; Estela E Rodriguez; M Isabel Bellocq; Pablo G Aceñolaza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Legume diversity patterns in West Central Africa: influence of species biology on distribution models.

Authors:  Manuel de la Estrella; Rubén G Mateo; Jan J Wieringa; Barbara Mackinder; Jesús Muñoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How global is the global biodiversity information facility?

Authors:  Chris Yesson; Peter W Brewer; Tim Sutton; Neil Caithness; Jaspreet S Pahwa; Mikhaila Burgess; W Alec Gray; Richard J White; Andrew C Jones; Frank A Bisby; Alastair Culham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.