Literature DB >> 15814150

The grooming analysis algorithm discriminates between different levels of anxiety in rats: potential utility for neurobehavioural stress research.

Allan V Kalueff1, Pentti Tuohimaa.   

Abstract

Stress has long been known to affect grooming in rodent species, altering both its activity measures and behavioural microstructure. Since stress disturbs a general pattern of self-grooming uninterrupted cephalocaudal progression, the grooming analysis algorithm (Kalueff and Tuohimaa, Brain Res. Protocols, 2004; 15: 151-8) was previously designed for mice to enable the detection of stress by measuring alterations in grooming microstructure in different test situations. Since mice and rats are known to differ in their behaviours, including grooming, the aim of the current study was to test our approach in rats and evaluate the utility of this method for differentiation between high- and low-stress situations. For this, we have developed the rat grooming analysis algorithm (based on ethological analysis of incorrect transitions contrary to the cephalocaudal rule, interrupted grooming activity and the assessment of the regional distribution of grooming) and applied this algorithm to the light-exposed (high stress) and dark-exposed (low stress) groups of rats. Here, we show that the percentage of 'incorrect' transitions between different grooming patterns, the percentage of interrupted grooming bouts and altered regional distribution of grooming (less caudal grooming, more rostral grooming) may be used as behavioural markers of stress in rats. Our results suggest that this method can be a useful tool in neurobehavioural stress research including modelling stress-evoked states, psychopharmacological or behavioural neurogenetics research in rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15814150     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  68 in total

1.  T-pattern analysis of diazepam-induced modifications on the temporal organization of rat behavioral response to anxiety in hole board.

Authors:  Maurizio Casarrubea; Filippina Sorbera; Magnus S Magnusson; Giuseppe Crescimanno
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Frequency dependence of behavioral modulation by hippocampal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Giorgio La Corte; Yina Wei; Nick Chernyy; Bruce J Gluckman; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Paternal experience and stress responses in California mice (Peromyscus californicus).

Authors:  Massimo Bardi; Catherine L Franssen; Joseph E Hampton; Eleanor A Shea; Amanda P Fanean; Kelly G Lambert
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  Upregulation of Anandamide Hydrolysis in the Basolateral Complex of Amygdala Reduces Fear Memory Expression and Indices of Stress and Anxiety.

Authors:  Maria Morena; Robert J Aukema; Kira D Leitl; Asim J Rashid; Haley A Vecchiarelli; Sheena A Josselyn; Matthew N Hill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Fenproporex increases locomotor activity and alters energy metabolism, and mood stabilizers reverse these changes: a proposal for a new animal model of mania.

Authors:  Gislaine T Rezin; Camila B Furlanetto; Giselli Scaini; Samira S Valvassori; Cinara L Gonçalves; Gabriela K Ferreira; Isabela C Jeremias; Wilson R Resende; Mariane R Cardoso; Roger B Varela; João Quevedo; Emilio L Streck
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 5.590

6.  Neuroanatomical Visualization of the Impaired Striatal Connectivity in Huntington's Disease Mouse Model.

Authors:  Dohee Kim; Jeha Jeon; Eunji Cheong; Dong Jin Kim; Hoon Ryu; Hyemyung Seo; Yun Kyung Kim
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  Modification of hippocampal markers of synaptic plasticity by memantine in animal models of acute and repeated restraint stress: implications for memory and behavior.

Authors:  Shaimaa Nasr Amin; Ahmed Amro El-Aidi; Mohamed Mostafa Ali; Yasser Mahmoud Attia; Laila Ahmed Rashed
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Characterization of the guinea pig animal model and subsequent comparison of the behavioral effects of selective dopaminergic drugs and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Kiera-Nicole Lee; Samuel T Pellom; Ericka Oliver; Sanika Chirwa
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Social housing and alcohol drinking in male-female pairs of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

Authors:  Caroline M Hostetler; Allison M J Anacker; Jennifer M Loftis; Andrey E Ryabinin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Social stress alters inhibitory synaptic input to distinct subpopulations of raphe serotonin neurons.

Authors:  LaTasha K Crawford; Shumaia F Rahman; Sheryl G Beck
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.