Literature DB >> 15813711

Use of a patient information system to audit the introduction of modified early warning scoring.

C P J Quarterman1, A N Thomas, M McKenna, R McNamee.   

Abstract

Modified early warning scoring (MEWS) uses abnormalities in routine observations to identify patients at risk of critical illness. Nurses recorded scores at or above the medical response score of 3 on a hospital clinical information system during the first year of introducing MEWS to 10 wards in a university hospital. A total of 619 triggers were recorded in 365 patients. Fifty-nine required intensive care unit (ICU)/high dependency unit (HDU) care; 71 died. Survival was significantly worse for initial scores >4 (35/104 patients died) than for scores 3-4 (P<0.004). Multivariant analysis showed age (P<0.001) and trigger score (P<0.001) but not ward specialty (P=0.1) predicted death. Mean ages of survivors and non-survivors were 64 years (SD 18) and 74 years (SD 17), respectively. Addition of a score for age did not significantly increase the area under a receiver operator characteristic curve for the predictive value of MEWS scores. The study shows that increasing MEWS score is associated with worse outcome across a range of specialties and that nursing staff will use a patient information system to audit MEWS scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15813711     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00513.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Medical emergency teams: current situation and perspectives of preventive in-hospital intensive care medicine].

Authors:  S G Russo; C Eich; M Roessler; B M Graf; M Quintel; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Utility of commonly captured data from an EHR to identify hospitalized patients at risk for clinical deterioration.

Authors:  Abel Kho; David Rotz; Kinan Alrahi; Wendy Cárdenas; Kristin Ramsey; David Liebovitz; Gary Noskin; Chuck Watts
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

4.  Evaluation of Early Warning Scoring System and Nursing Guide Application in Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit.

Authors:  Berrin Pazar; Ayla Yava
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-05-23

5.  The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Fang Gao; Teresa Melody; Darren F Daniels; Simon Giles; Samantha Fox
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Early warning scoring systems versus standard observations charts for wards in South Africa: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Una Kyriacos; Jennifer Jelsma; Michael James; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  A smart all-in-one device to measure vital signs in admitted patients.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Harry van Goor; Maartje van Acht; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Tom H van de Belt; Sebastian J H Bredie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Jobbe P L Leenen; Eline M Dijkman; Joris D van Dijk; Henderik L van Westreenen; Cor Kalkman; Lisette Schoonhoven; Gijsbert A Patijn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs Using Wearable Devices on the General Ward: Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Harry van Goor; Bas Frietman; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven; Jan Smit; Sebastian Jh Bredie; Tom H van de Belt
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review.

Authors:  Idar Johan Brekke; Lars Håland Puntervoll; Peter Bank Pedersen; John Kellett; Mikkel Brabrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.