Literature DB >> 15812753

A comparison of cardiac resynchronization by sequential biventricular pacing and left ventricular pacing to simultaneous biventricular pacing: rationale and design of the DECREASE-HF clinical trial.

David B De Lurgio1, Elyse Foster, Michael B Higginbotham, Kinley Larntz, Leslie A Saxon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The first generation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices approved for the treatment of heart failure used simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing to achieve ventricular resynchronization. Left ventricular pacing alone and sequential BiV pacing also show promise as alternative ways to deliver CRT, but have not been studied together in a large randomized trial.
METHODS: The Device Evaluation of CONTAK RENEWAL 2 and EASYTRAK 2: Assessment of Safety and Effectiveness in Heart Failure (DECREASE-HF) Trial is a randomized, double-blind, 3-arm study of patients in New York Heart Association Class III or IV with an ejection fraction of 35% or less and a QRS duration > or =150 ms. Patients are randomized to receive either left ventricular pacing, simultaneous BiV pacing, or sequential BiV pacing.
CONCLUSION: The study uses a novel composite endpoint that combines peak oxygen consumption and left ventricular end systolic dimension, thus combining a measure of symptomatic improvement (peak oxygen consumption) with a physiologic measure of ventricular reverse remodeling (left ventricular end systolic dimension) into a single composite score. Additionally, the safety and effectiveness of the CONTAK RENEWAL 2/4/4HE/EASYTRAK 2 system will be evaluated using: heart failure-related adverse events; system-related complications; left ventricular lead-related complications; detection time of induced ventricular fibrillation; and left ventricular lead performance (pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and R-wave amplitude).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15812753     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.08.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  2 in total

1.  Innovations in the development of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices with defibrillation capability-the Boston Scientific experience.

Authors:  Patrick Yong; Erdulfo Deperalta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure: current status.

Authors:  J Claude Daubert; Christophe Leclercq; Erwan Donal; Philippe Mabo
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.654

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.