Literature DB >> 15812744

Left heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: identification of different pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Mathew S Maurer1, Donald L King, Lyna El-Khoury Rumbarger, Milton Packer, Daniel Burkhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome, a single pathophysiologic mechanism, diastolic dysfunction, is often ascribed to explain this condition. In view of the clinical heterogeneity of these patients, we hypothesized that subgroups of HFNEF patients may have different underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Freehand 3-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes in 99 asymptomatic normal controls and 2 groups with chronic heart failure: 35 patients with normal ejection fraction with longstanding hypertension (hypertensive HFNEF) and 11 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without a history of hypertension (nonhypertensive HFNEF). These data, combined with cuff sphygmomanometry and Doppler estimates of LV end-diastolic pressure (EDP) yielded estimated pressure-volume loops and slope (E es,sb ) of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship, a load independent index of chamber contractility. Nonhypertensive HFNEF patients required high EDPs (21 +/- 2 versus 15 +/- 3 mm Hg in normals, P < .0001) to achieve normal EDVs (98 +/- 25 versus 95 +/- 21 mL in normals, P = NS). Although systolic function (E es,sb ) did not differ from normal, systolic blood pressure was lower than normal in these patients (114 +/- 10 versus 124 +/- 14 mm Hg in normals, P < .05). Hypertensive HFNEF patients also had increased EDP (20 +/- 2 mm Hg), but this was observed at higher than normal EDVs (118 +/- 29 mL, P < .05). Among patients with hypertensive HFNEF, 2 subgroups emerged, 1 with a high E es,sb (4.23 +/- 0.54 versus 2.1 +/- 0.7 mm Hg/mL) and 1 with normal E es,sb (2.31 +/- 0.51 mm Hg/mL). The former group was composed of elderly women with small body size (body surface area 1.7 +/- 0.2 versus 1.9 +/- 0.2 m 2 , P = .02) who had concentrically remodeled ventricles and low stroke volumes. The latter group was more diverse in age, body size, and included patients of both genders with increases in ventricular volumes, stroke volume, and mass consistent with a volume overload state.
CONCLUSION: Although HFNEF is commonly thought of as being the result of a single hemodynamic mechanism, these data indicate that subgroups exist with distinctly different underlying pathophysiologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15812744     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  51 in total

1.  Congestion is the driving force behind heart failure.

Authors:  Maya Guglin
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-09

2.  Evaluating the safety and efficacy of sodium-restricted/Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet after acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization: design and rationale for the Geriatric OUt of hospital Randomized MEal Trial in Heart Failure (GOURMET-HF).

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wessler; Mathew S Maurer; Scott L Hummel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Ventriculovascular coupling in systolic and diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Justin M Fox; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2005-12

4.  Ventriculovascular coupling in systolic and diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Justin M Fox; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Inefficient Ventriculoarterial Coupling in Fontan Patients: A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study.

Authors:  Max E Godfrey; Rahul H Rathod; Ellen Keenan; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Andrew J Powell; Tal Geva; Ashwin Prakash
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF): embracing complexity.

Authors:  Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Daniel H Katz; Senthil Selvaraj; Michael A Burke; Clyde W Yancy; Mihai Gheorghiade; Robert O Bonow; Chiang-Ching Huang; Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Pilot study for left ventricular imaging phenotype of patients over 65 years old with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the high prevalence of amyloid cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Youssef Bennani Smires; Gérard Victor; David Ribes; Matthieu Berry; Thomas Cognet; Simon Méjean; Antoine Huart; Murielle Roussel; Antoine Petermann; Jérôme Roncalli; Didier Carrié; Hervé Rousseau; Isabelle Berry; Dominique Chauveau; Michel Galinier; Olivier Lairez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Phenotypic spectrum of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Daniel H Katz; Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 10.  The heart failure epidemic.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.