Literature DB >> 15812582

Screening elderly women for risk of future fractures--participation rates and impact on incidence of falls and fractures.

R J Barr1, A Stewart, D J Torgerson, D G Seymour, D M Reid.   

Abstract

We have assessed the acceptability of a method for screening for risk of future hip fracture in elderly women. After receipt of an initial response to a mailed risk-factor questionnaire sent out to 5,306 women, women were randomly assigned to active or control groups. The active group was invited to participate in a screening visit that comprised a life-style questionnaire and a quantitative ultrasound heel scan. General practitioners (GPs) of women who were found to be in the lowest quartile of broadband ultrasound attenuation and/or who had two or more risk factors for hip fracture were advised to prescribe a calcium and vitamin D supplement. A second mailed questionnaire was sent to both groups 1 to 3 years later. Compared with the control group, the active group had a 56% lower risk of fracture (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.81 adjusted age, weight, and treatment status). At follow-up, the proportion of fallers in the active group (25.3%) was lower than that in the control group (29.6%) (P = 0.064). The control group was found to have a higher rate of falls at follow-up than the active group (95% CI, 0.02-0.22); no difference was found at baseline (95% CI, -0.08 to +0.14). The screening method used was found to be acceptable to the majority of elderly women in this study. Screening the elderly in this way together with simple advice on treatment appears to reduce the age-associated increase in fall rates and the number of subsequent fractures. This form of screening may provide a cost-effective method to reduce falls and fractures in free-living elderly women. However, no such cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15812582     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

1.  Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis-the ROSE trial.

Authors:  M J Rothmann; S Möller; T Holmberg; M Højberg; J Gram; M Bech; K Brixen; A P Hermann; C-C Glüer; R Barkmann; K H Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Kastner; L Perrier; S E P Munce; C C Adhihetty; A Lau; J Hamid; V Treister; J Chan; Y Lai; S E Straus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Effectiveness of interventions to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M-C Laliberté; S Perreault; G Jouini; B J Shea; L Lalonde
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2008-10-01

Review 5.  Clinical decision support tools for osteoporosis disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Monika Kastner; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  A captive audience: a pilot study of screening and counseling hospitalized women for fracture risk.

Authors:  Kathryn M Ryder; Lori A Kessler; Carol B Jones; Ronald I Shorr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening older women for the prevention of fractures: rationale, design and methods for the SCOOP study.

Authors:  L Shepstone; R Fordham; E Lenaghan; I Harvey; C Cooper; N Gittoes; A Heawood; T J Peters; T O'Neill; D Torgerson; R Holland; A Howe; T Marshall; J A Kanis; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.

Authors:  Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Catherine Sherrington; Simon Gates; Lindy M Clemson; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 9.  Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.

Authors:  Berber Koopmans; Mark M J Nielen; François G Schellevis; Joke C Korevaar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Screening for low bone mass with quantitative ultrasonography in a community without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: population-based survey.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Ian Jen; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Shui-Hu Chen; Pesus Chou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.