| Literature DB >> 15811835 |
Alexandra Henneberger1, Wojciech Zareba, Angela Ibald-Mulli, Regina Rückerl, Josef Cyrys, Jean-Phillippe Couderc, Betty Mykins, Gabriele Woelke, H-Erich Wichmann, Annette Peters.
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies report associations between particulate air pollution and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms are still unclear. We tested the hypothesis that patients with preexisting coronary heart disease experience changes in the repolarization parameters in association with rising concentrations of air pollution. A prospective panel study was conducted in Erfurt, East Germany, with 12 repeated electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings in 56 males with ischemic heart disease. Hourly particulate and gaseous air pollution and meteorologic data were acquired. The following ECG parameters reflecting myocardial substrate and vulnerability were measured: QT duration, T-wave amplitude, T-wave complexity, and variability of T-wave complexity. Fixed effect regression analysis was used adjusting for subject, trend, weekday, and meteorology. The analysis showed a significant increase in QT duration in response to exposure to organic carbon; a significant decrease in T-wave amplitude with exposure to ultrafine, accumulation mode, and PM2.5 particles (particles < 2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter); and a corresponding significant increase of T-wave complexity in association with PM2.5 particles for the 24 hr before ECG recordings. Variability of T-wave complexity showed a significant increase with organic and elemental carbon in the same time interval. This study provides evidence suggesting an immediate effect of air pollution on repolarization duration, morphology, and variability representing myocardial substrate and vulnerability, key factors in the mechanisms of cardiac death.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15811835 PMCID: PMC1278484 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Description of the study population (56 male subjects with a history of coronary artery disease).
| Clinical and ECG characteristics | Mean ± SD or total (%) |
|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | |
| Age (years) | 66 ± 6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28 ± 4 |
| Past myocardial infarction | 43 (77) |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 12 (21) |
| Revascularization (CABG/PTCA) | 48 (86) |
| COPD | 5 (9) |
| Hypertension | 39 (70) |
| NYHA ≥II | 17 (30) |
| Occupational status | |
| Work part time or full time | 4 (7) |
| Retired | 49 (88) |
| Unable to work or unemployed | 3 (5) |
| Exposed to toxic gases, dust, or fumes during work | 1 (2) |
| Smoking | |
| Never smoker | 15 (27) |
| Ex-smoker | 41 (73) |
| Medication use | |
| β-Blockers | 43 (77) |
| ACE inhibitors | 30 (54) |
| Calcium blockers | 17 (30) |
| Nitrate | 24 (43) |
| Statins and fibrates | 29 (52) |
| ECG parameters | |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 64.7 ± 9.9 |
| QTc interval | 428.3 ± 35.6 |
| T-wave complexity (%) | 21.6 ± 12.8 |
| Variability of T-wave complexity (%) | 2.5 ± 1.8 |
| T-wave amplitude | 256.0 ± 126.9 |
Abbreviations: CABG/PTCA, coronary artery bypass graft surgery/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (both procedures had to be performed more than 3 months before enrollment); COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NYHA, New York Heart Association classification.
Manually measured from lead II, Bazett corrected.
Median value from leads I, II, and V1–V6.
Daily concentration of air pollutants and meteorologic variables between 12 October 2000 and 27 April 2001.
| Variable | No. | Mean ± SD | Minimum | 25% | Median | 75% | Maximum | IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFP (n/cm3) | 196 | 12,602 ± 6,455 | 2,542 | 7,326 | 11,444 | 17,332 | 34,294 | 10,005 |
| ACP (n/cm3) | 167 | 1,593 ± 1,034 | 328 | 821 | 1,238 | 2,120 | 4,908 | 1,299 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 197 | 20.0 ± 15.0 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 14.9 | 26.1 | 83.7 | 16.4 |
| OC (μg/m3) | 126 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 0.7 |
| EC (μg/m3) | 126 | 2.6 ± 2.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 12.4 | 2.3 |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 198 | 4.1 ± 1.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 11.7 | 1.5 |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 198 | 34.3 ± 11.4 | 8.0 | 25.3 | 34.0 | 42.5 | 68.4 | 17.2 |
| CO (mg/m3) | 198 | 0.52 ± 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 1.93 | 0.27 |
| NO (μg/m3) | 196 | 24.3 ± 27.8 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 12.3 | 30.3 | 137.6 | 23.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 198 | 4.1 ± 4.8 | −10.4 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 7.9 | 13.2 | 7.4 |
| Barometric pressure (hPa) | 198 | 973.4 ± 9.7 | 949.5 | 966.3 | 972.9 | 980.0 | 995.7 | 13.6 |
| Relative humidity (%) | 198 | 83.5 ± 8.8 | 55.8 | 78.9 | 84.3 | 88.8 | 100.0 | 10.0 |
621 (13%) of the hourly measurements were imputed.
715 (15%) of the hourly measurements were imputed.
Measurements started 18 December 2000.
24 (0.5%) of the hourly measurements were imputed.
Figure 1Time series of UFP and PM2.5 concentrations together with air temperature.
Effect estimates of particulate air pollution on repolarization parameters reflecting myocardial substrate and vulnerability per IQR (95% CI).
| Hours before recording | QTc interval (msec) | T-wave amplitude (μV) | T-wave complexity (%) | Variability of T-wave complexity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFP | ||||
| 0–5 hr | 0.16 (−2.67–2.98) | −5.91 (−9.80–−2.01)[ | 0.46 (−0.09–1.01)[ | 0.06 (−0.07–0.20) |
| 6–11 hr | 3.59 (−0.69–7.87) | −5.90 (−12.01–0.21)[ | 0.41 (−0.44–1.26) | 0.04 (−0.17–0.25) |
| 12–17 hr | 1.98 (−1.71–5.68) | −1.91 (−7.17–3.35) | 0.01 (−0.71–0.73) | 0.04 (−0.14–0.22) |
| 18–23 hr | 3.07 (−0.77–6.91) | −2.53 (−7.85–2.78) | 0.76 (0.03–1.49)[ | 0.09 (−0.09–0.27) |
| 0–23 hr | 3.77 (−0.97–8.52) | −7.30 (−13.97–−0.63)[ | 0.74 (−0.19–1.66) | 0.10 (−0.13–0.34) |
| ACP | ||||
| 0–5 hr | 1.87 (−1.13–4.87) | −5.54 (−9.51–−1.57)[ | 0.34 (−0.30–0.97) | 0.12 (−0.04–0.27) |
| 6–11 hr | 5.15 (0.95–9.36)[ | −5.34 (−10.93–0.26)[ | −0.01 (−0.89–0.86) | 0.14 (−0.07–0.36) |
| 12–17 hr | 3.36 (−0.32–7.03)[ | −3.64 (−8.52–1.23) | 0.17 (−0.58–0.92) | 0.17 (−0.02–0.35)[ |
| 18–23 hr | 2.12 (−1.41–5.67) | −3.95 (−8.67–0.76) | 0.38 (−0.35–1.11) | 0.12 (−0.05–0.30) |
| 0–23 hr | 3.70 (−0.35–7.75)[ | −6.31 (−11.66–−0.95)[ | 0.38 (−0.49–1.25) | 0.17 (−0.04–0.38) |
| PM2.5 | ||||
| 0–5 hr | 3.06 (−0.23–6.35)[ | −6.46 (−10.88–−2.04)[ | 0.84 (0.17–1.51)[ | 0.15 (−0.02–0.31)[ |
| 6–11 hr | 2.83 (−0.80–6.45) | −2.00 (−6.95–2.96) | −0.04 (−0.77–0.98) | 0.05 (−0.13–0.23) |
| 12–17 hr | 1.68 (−1.22–4.59) | −0.72 (−4.77–3.33) | −0.07 (−0.62–0.48) | 0.07 (−0.05–0.18) |
| 18–23 hr | 1.11 (−1.95–4.16) | −3.99 (−8.22–0.24)[ | 0.25 (−0.32–0.83) | 0.08 (−0.04–0.20) |
| 0–23 hr | 2.77 (−0.90–6.44) | −4.11 (−9.13–0.90) | 0.35 (−0.37–1.07) | 0.14 (−0.01–0.28)[ |
| OC | ||||
| 0–5 hr | 4.15 (0.22–8.09)[ | −4.31 (−10.07–1.44) | 0.31 (−0.39–1.01) | 0.12 (−0.01–0.26)[ |
| 6–11 hr | 4.72 (0.20–9.24)[ | 0.50 (−6.30–7.30) | −0.54 (−1.34–0.26) | 0.11 (−0.04–0.26) |
| 12–17 hr | 4.15 (0.08–8.21)[ | −1.13 (−7.29–5.03) | 0.26 (−0.47–0.99) | 0.19 (0.05–0.32)[ |
| 18–23 hr | 3.35 (−0.26–6.95)[ | −2.37 (−6.93–2.18) | 0.11 (−0.52–0.73) | 0.09 (−0.03–0.22) |
| 0–23 hr | 5.79 (1.38–10.19)[ | −2.72 (−9.27–3.83) | 0.20 (−0.59–1.00) | 0.16 (0.02–0.31)[ |
| EC | ||||
| 0–5 hr | 1.97 (−1.79–5.73) | −4.67 (−10.00–0.67)[ | 0.52 (−0.16–1.21) | 0.13 (0.00–0.26)[ |
| 6–11 hr | 2.52 (−2.15–7.19) | −0.81 (−7.92–6.31) | −0.23 (−1.10–0.64) | 0.10 (−0.06–0.26) |
| 12–17 hr | 1.94 (−1.58–5.46) | −1.15 (−6.56–4.25) | 0.33 (−0.32–0.98) | 0.16 (0.04–0.29)[ |
| 18–23 hr | 1.88 (−1.54–5.30) | −2.92 (−7.31–1.47) | 0.21 (−0.41–0.83) | 0.10 (−0.01–0.22)[ |
| 0–23 hr | 3.07 (−1.21–7.34) | −3.38 (−9.81–3.05) | 0.42 (−0.40–1.23) | 0.18 (0.03–0.32)[ |
All models included the categorical variables patient number and weekday, and in addition, the following variables: for QTc interval—trend loess (df = 6.0), temperature lag 3 loess (df = 6.2), relative humidity lag 1 polynomial (second order), and barometric pressure lag 1 linear; for T-wave complexity—trend loess (df = 2.3), temperature lag 3 polynomial (second order), relative humidity lag 3 loess (df = 6.7), and barometric pressure lag 0 polynomial (third order); for T-wave amplitude—trend polynomial (third order), temperature lag 2 linear, relative humidity lag 3 polynomial (third order), and barometric pressure lag 3 linear; for variability of T-wave complexity—trend loess (df = 3.4), temperature lag 3 loess (df = 4.6), relative humidity lag 2 polynomial (second order), and barometric pressure lag 0 loess (df = 4.1).
p < 0.10 (borderline significant).
p < 0.05 (significant).
p < 0.01 (highly significant).
Figure 2Effect estimates with 95% CIs of particulate and gaseous air pollution during the 6 hr and 24 hr before the recording of (A) QTc interval, (B) T-wave amplitude, and (C) T-wave complexity.
Figure 3Effect estimates with 95% CIs of PM2.5 concentrations during the 6 hr before the recording on T-wave parameters reflecting myocardial substrate and vulnerability.