Literature DB >> 15811393

Differential effects of removing the glucose or saccharin components of a glucose-saccharin mixture in a successive negative contrast paradigm.

Colin P Mitchell1, Charles F Flaherty.   

Abstract

When rats experience an unexpected decrease in reward value, e.g., from 32% sucrose to 4% sucrose, consummatory behavior abruptly decreases to a level below control subjects that only experience the lesser reward, a phenomenon known as Successive Negative Contrast (SNC). In food deprived rats experiencing downshifts in sucrose concentration, SNC dissipates in 3-4 days, as consummatory behavior in shifted rats recovers to the level of unshifted controls. In Experiment 1 food deprived rats that were given 5 min daily access to a 2% glucose-0.15% saccharin mixture, and subsequently shifted to 2% glucose alone, displayed a dramatic SNC effect relative to rats that only received 2% glucose. This SNC effect was primarily manifested as a decrease in the number of consummatory bursts initiated. Interestingly, intake failed to recover to control levels during eight daily postshift sessions. However, in Experiment 2 subjects that were shifted from the same glucose-saccharin mixture to 0.15% saccharin alone failed to show SNC rather, intake fell to the level of control animals which only received 0.15% saccharin. The data from Experiment 1, in conjunction with previous studies utilizing non-deprived rats, quinine adulteration, or shifts from sucrose to saccharin, show that reductions in taste value can produce contrast effects, but suggest that a threshold caloric value is necessary for recovery. The data from Experiment 2 may suggest that saccharin and glucose do not contribute equally to the enhanced palatability of the mixture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811393     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  2 in total

1.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Psychopharmacological characterisation of the successive negative contrast effect in rats.

Authors:  C E Phelps; E N Mitchell; D J Nutt; H M Marston; E S J Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.