Literature DB >> 15811244

Revisiting previously searched locations in visual neglect: role of right parietal and frontal lesions in misjudging old locations as new.

Sabira K Mannan1, Dominic J Mort, Tim L Hodgson, Jon Driver, Christopher Kennard, Masud Husain.   

Abstract

Right-hemisphere patients with left neglect often demonstrate abnormal visual search, re-examining stimuli to the right while ignoring those to the left. But re-fixations alone do not reveal if patients misjudge whether they have searched a location before. Here, we not only tracked the eye movements of 16 neglect patients during search, but also asked them to click a response button only when they judged they were fixating a target for the very first time. ''Re-clicking'' on previously found targets would indicate that patients erroneously respond to these as new discoveries. Lesions were mapped with high-resolution MRI. Neglect patients with damage involving the right intraparietal sulcus or right inferior frontal lobe ''re-clicked'' on previously found targets on the right at a pathological rate, whereas those with medial occipito-temporal lesions did not. For the intraparietal sulcus patients, the probability of erroneous re-clicks on an old target increased with time since first discovering it; whereas for frontal patients it was independent of search time, suggesting different underlying mechanisms in these two types of patient. Re-click deficits correlated with degree of leftward neglect, mainly due to both being severe in intraparietal cases. These results demonstrate that misjudging previously searched locations for new ones can contribute to pathological search in neglect, with potentially different mechanisms being involved in intraparietal versus inferior frontal patients. When combined with a spatial bias to the right, such deficits might explain why many neglect patients often re-examine rightward locations, at the expense of items to their left.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811244     DOI: 10.1162/0898929053124983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  35 in total

1.  Continuous ASL perfusion fMRI investigation of higher cognition: quantification of tonic CBF changes during sustained attention and working memory tasks.

Authors:  Junghoon Kim; John Whyte; Jiongjiong Wang; Hengyi Rao; Kathy Z Tang; John A Detre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Been there, seen that: a neural mechanism for performing efficient visual search.

Authors:  Koorosh Mirpour; Fabrice Arcizet; Wei Song Ong; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual neglect: is there a relationship between impaired spatial working memory and re-cancellation?

Authors:  Murielle Wansard; Thierry Meulemans; Sophie Gillet; Fermin Segovia; Christine Bastin; Monica N Toba; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Which perseverative behaviors are symptoms of spatial neglect?

Authors:  Meghan D Caulfield; Peii Chen; Michele M Barry; A M Barrett
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 7.  Spatial neglect: clinical and neuroscience review: a wealth of information on the poverty of spatial attention.

Authors:  John C Adair; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Modelling visual neglect: computational insights into conscious perception.

Authors:  Linda J Lanyon; Susan L Denham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Some surprising findings on the involvement of the parietal lobe in human memory.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Marian Berryhill
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Raquel F G Catalao; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.