Literature DB >> 15810868

Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach.

Mike W-L Cheung1, Wai Chan2.   

Abstract

To synthesize studies that use structural equation modeling (SEM), researchers usually use Pearson correlations (univariate r), Fisher z scores (univariate z), or generalized least squares (GLS) to combine the correlation matrices. The pooled correlation matrix is then analyzed by the use of SEM. Questionable inferences may occur for these ad hoc procedures. A 2-stage structural equation modeling (TSSEM) method is proposed to incorporate meta-analytic techniques and SEM into a unified framework. Simulation results reveal that the univariate-r, univariate-z, and TSSEM methods perform well in testing the homogeneity of correlation matrices and estimating the pooled correlation matrix. When fitting SEM, only TSSEM works well. The GLS method performed poorly in small to medium samples. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15810868     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  52 in total

1.  A meta-analytic investigation of the structure of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

Authors:  Tom Yufik; Leonard J Simms
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-11

2.  Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Silvia Sörensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-03

3.  [A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis on the Outcome Variables of Nursing Unit Managers' Transformational Leadership: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis].

Authors:  Sunmi Kim; Seok Hee Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.984

4.  The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

Authors:  Justin E Karr; Corson N Areshenkoff; Philippe Rast; Scott M Hofer; Grant L Iverson; Mauricio A Garcia-Barrera
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The motivation to express prejudice.

Authors:  Patrick S Forscher; William T L Cox; Nicholas Graetz; Patricia G Devine
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-11

6.  Factors influencing stakeholders attitudes toward genetically modified aedes mosquito.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Hasrizul Hashim
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Model-driven meta-analyses for informing health care: a diabetes meta-analysis as an exemplar.

Authors:  Sharon A Brown; Betsy Jane Becker; Alexandra A García; Adama Brown; Gilbert Ramírez
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Predicting physical activity among cancer survivors: Meta-analytic path modeling of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Rachel Hirschey; Ashley Leak Bryant; Catherine Macek; Claudio Battaglini; Sheila Santacroce; Kerry S Courneya; Jennifer S Walker; Aya Avishai; Paschal Sheeran
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 9.  Everyday life experiences and mental health among conflict-affected forced migrants: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wai Kai Hou; Huinan Liu; Li Liang; Jeffery Ho; Hyojin Kim; Eunice Seong; George A Bonanno; Stevan E Hobfoll; Brian J Hall
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Mapping the Mixed Methods-Mixed Research Synthesis Terrain.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Jennifer Leeman; Jamie L Crandell
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2011-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.