Literature DB >> 15810795

Impact of a homestead gardening program on household food security and empowerment of women in Bangladesh.

Victor N Bushamuka1, Saskia de Pee, Aminuzzaman Talukder, Lynnda Kiess, Dora Panagides, Abu Taher, Martin Bloem.   

Abstract

This paper assesses the additional benefits of a homestead gardening program designed to control vitamin A deficiency in Bangladesh. In February and March 2002, data were collected on the food security and social status of women from 2,160 households of active and former participants in the gardening program and from control groups in order to assess the impact and sustainability of the program. The proportions of active and former-participant households that gardened year-round were fivefold and threefold, respectively, higher than that of the control group (78% and 50% vs. 15%). In a three-month period, the households of active participants produced a median of 135 kg and consumed a median of 85 kg of vegetables, while the control households produced a median of 46 kg and consumed a median of 38 kg (p <.001). About 64% of the active-participant households generated a median garden income of 347 taka (US$1 = 51 taka), which was spent mainly on food, and 25% of the control households generated 200 taka in the same period (p < .001). The garden production and income levels of formerly participating households three years after withdrawal of program support were much higher than those of the control households, illustrating the sustainability of the program and its ability to increase household food security. Significantly more women in active- and former-participant households than in control households perceived that they had increased their economic contribution to their households since the time the program was launched in their subdistricts (> 85% vs. 52%). Similar results were found for the level of influence gained by women on household decision-making. These results highlight the multiple benefits that homestead gardening programs can bring and demonstrate that these benefits should be considered when selecting nutritional and development approaches targeting poor households.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15810795     DOI: 10.1177/156482650502600102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Nutr Bull        ISSN: 0379-5721            Impact factor:   2.069


  20 in total

1.  Effect of enhanced homestead food production and aquaculture on dietary intakes of women and children in rural Cambodia: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vashti Verbowski; Zaman Talukder; Kroeun Hou; Ly Sok Hoing; Kristina Michaux; Victoria Anderson; Rosalind Gibson; Kathy H Li; Larry D Lynd; Judy McLean; Tim J Green; Susan I Barr
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions and gender dynamics: A qualitative study in Nepal.

Authors:  Cecilie Kjeldsberg; Niva Shrestha; Miti Patel; Dale Davis; Gary Mundy; Kenda Cunningham
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Mixed-methods study identifies key strategies for improving infant and young child feeding practices in a highly stunted rural indigenous population in Guatemala.

Authors:  Kelley Brown; Nicole Henretty; Anita Chary; Meghan Farley Webb; Heather Wehr; Jillian Moore; Caitlin Baird; Anne Kraemer Díaz; Peter Rohloff
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Key principles to improve programmes and interventions in complementary feeding.

Authors:  Chessa K Lutter; Lora Iannotti; Hilary Creed-Kanashiro; Agnes Guyon; Bernadette Daelmans; Rebecca Robert; Rukhsana Haider
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Food insecurity: special considerations for women.

Authors:  Louise C Ivers; Kimberly A Cullen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Are home gardening programs a sustainable way to improve nutrition? Lessons from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Rufiji, Tanzania.

Authors:  Mia M Blakstad; Dominic Mosha; Lilia Bliznashka; Alexandra L Bellows; Chelsey R Canavan; Mashavu H Yussuf; Killian Mlalama; Isabel Madzorera; Jarvis T Chen; Ramadhani A Noor; Joyce Kinabo; Honorati Masanja; Wafaie W Fawzi
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.080

Review 7.  Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing.

Authors:  George C Patton; Susan M Sawyer; John S Santelli; David A Ross; Rima Afifi; Nicholas B Allen; Monika Arora; Peter Azzopardi; Wendy Baldwin; Christopher Bonell; Ritsuko Kakuma; Elissa Kennedy; Jaqueline Mahon; Terry McGovern; Ali H Mokdad; Vikram Patel; Suzanne Petroni; Nicola Reavley; Kikelomo Taiwo; Jane Waldfogel; Dakshitha Wickremarathne; Carmen Barroso; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Adesegun O Fatusi; Amitabh Mattoo; Judith Diers; Jing Fang; Jane Ferguson; Frederick Ssewamala; Russell M Viner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Bayesian belief network modelling of household food security in rural South Africa.

Authors:  Robert W Eyre; Thomas House; F Xavier Gómez-Olivé; Frances E Griffiths
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Effectiveness of agricultural interventions that aim to improve nutritional status of children: systematic review.

Authors:  Edoardo Masset; Lawrence Haddad; Alexander Cornelius; Jairo Isaza-Castro
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-17

10.  Cost-effectiveness of community vegetable gardens for people living with HIV in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Chloe Puett; Cécile Salpéteur; Elisabeth Lacroix; Simbarashe Dennis Zimunya; Anne-Dominique Israël; Myriam Aït-Aïssa
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.