Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 High-resolution magnifying upper endoscopy in a patient with patchy celiac disease.

Literature DB >> 15810649

High-resolution magnifying upper endoscopy in a patient with patchy celiac disease.

Giovanni Cammarota¹, Antonio Martino, Simona Di Caro, Rossella Cianci, Piera G Lecca, Fabio M Vecchio, Giovanni Gasbarrini.

Abstract

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2005 PMID： 15810649 DOI： 10.1007/s10620-005-2481-4

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dig Dis Sci ISSN： 0163-2116 Impact factor: 3.199

× No keyword cloud information.

16 in total

Review 1. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists.

Authors: G Oberhuber; G Granditsch; H Vogelsang
Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 2.566

Review 2. Technology status evaluation report. High resolution and high-magnification endoscopy.

Authors:
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.427

3. The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.

Authors: Amy S Oxentenko; Scott W Grisolano; Joseph A Murray; Lawrence J Burgart; Ross A Dierkhising; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 10.864

4. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease.

Authors: H Vogelsang; S Hänel; B Steiner; G Oberhuber
Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 10.093

5. Endoscopic features of celiac disease in children.

Authors: A M Ravelli; P Tobanelli; L Minelli; V Villanacci; R Cestari
Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 9.427

6. Value of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.

Authors: E Mauriño; H Capizzano; S Niveloni; Z Kogan; J Valero; L Boerr; J C Bai
Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 3.199

7. Observer variation in assessment of jejunal biopsy specimens. A comparison between subjective criteria and morphometric measurement.

Authors: G R Corazza; F Bonvicini; M Frazzoni; M Gatto; G Gasbarrini
Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1982-12 Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3. Capsule endoscopy in celiac disease.

Authors: Cristiano Spada; Maria-Elena Riccioni; Riccardo Urgesi; Guido Costamagna
Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742

3 in total

High-resolution magnifying upper endoscopy in a patient with patchy celiac disease.

Review 1. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists.

Review 2. Technology status evaluation report. High resolution and high-magnification endoscopy.

3. The insensitivity of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.

4. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease.

5. Endoscopic features of celiac disease in children.

6. Value of endoscopic markers in celiac disease.

7. Observer variation in assessment of jejunal biopsy specimens. A comparison between subjective criteria and morphometric measurement.

8. Endoscopic markers in adult coeliac disease.

9. Lack of endoscopic visualization of intestinal villi with the "immersion technique" in overt atrophic celiac disease.

10. Patchy villous atrophy of the duodenum in childhood celiac disease.

Review 1. Emerging technologies in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and celiac disease.

Review 2. Endoscopic tools for the diagnosis and evaluation of celiac disease.

Review 3. Capsule endoscopy in celiac disease.