Literature DB >> 15808970

Early, partly anticipatory, neural oscillations during identification set the stage for priming.

Emrah Düzel1, Alan Richardson-Klavehn, Markus Neufang, Björn H Schott, Michael Scholz, Hans-Jochen Heinze.   

Abstract

Perceptual priming is a fundamental long-term memory capability by which exposure to a stimulus improves later perceptual processing of that stimulus. A widespread hypothesis is that priming is the later result of perceptual learning during stimulus identification. Testing this hypothesis involves isolating priming without explicit memory, and appropriately measuring brain activity during initial experimental exposure to assess whether brain activity related to identification differs as a function of later priming. Here, we show, using magnetoencephalography (MEG), that words primed in a later test are distinguished from unprimed words at initial exposure by (a) more specific responses in perceptual brain areas, indicated by an early (within 240 ms after word onset) decrease in amplitude but increase in phase alignment of beta and gamma oscillations, and (b) improved coordination of responses across perceptual and higher brain areas in the same time window, indicated by an increase in interareal phase synchrony of alpha oscillations. The increase in interareal phase synchrony partly started already in the pre-stimulus period, approximately 60-80 ms prior to word onset, showing that the improved coordination of responses across areas was partly anticipatory. The anatomy and early timing of these patterns reveal a neural link between identification and long-term memory. The pre-stimulus findings additionally show that priming is related to the stimulus-specific anticipatory state of visual identification areas at initial exposure.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15808970     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication.

Authors:  Avniel S Ghuman; Moshe Bar; Ian G Dobbins; David M Schnyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multiple forms of learning yield temporally distinct electrophysiological repetition effects.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Race; David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Object repetition leads to local increases in the temporal coordination of neural responses.

Authors:  Jessica R Gilbert; Stephen J Gotts; Frederick W Carver; Alex Martin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Prestimulus subsequent memory effects for auditory and visual events.

Authors:  Leun J Otten; Angela H Quayle; Bhamini Puvaneswaran
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Neuroanatomical dissociation of encoding processes related to priming and explicit memory.

Authors:  Björn H Schott; Alan Richardson-Klavehn; Richard N A Henson; Christine Becker; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Emrah Düzel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Thalamic theta phase alignment predicts human memory formation and anterior thalamic cross-frequency coupling.

Authors:  Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Tino Zaehle; Jürgen Voges; Friedhelm C Schmitt; Lars Buentjen; Klaus Kopitzki; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael D Rugg; Robert T Knight; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation.

Authors:  Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Tino Zaehle; Juergen Voges; Friedhelm C Schmitt; Lars Buentjen; Klaus Kopitzki; Christine Esslinger; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Robert T Knight; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Neural correlates of true and false memory in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Catherine M Sweeney-Reed; Patricia M Riddell; Judi A Ellis; Jayne E Freeman; Slawomir J Nasuto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Available processing resources influence encoding-related brain activity before an event.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; A Dorothea Gebert; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.027

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.