Literature DB >> 15808387

Long-term prospective randomized study comparing two different regimens of oxybutynin as a treatment for detrusor overactivity.

Stefano Salvatore1, Vikram Khullar, Linda Cardozo, Rodolfo Milani, Stavros Athanasiou, Con Kelleher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prospective randomized trial to compare two low starting doses of oxybutynin, using an incremental regimen to assess patient compliance and treatment efficacy in the long-term. STUDY
DESIGN: Women with detrusor overactivity were included. Oxybutynin was randomly prescribed with a starting dose of either 2.5 mg bd or 5 mg nocte. Instructions were given to increase oxybutynin up to 5 mg tds over a period of 6 weeks fortnightly. After two years we re-contacted all the women, using a specific questionnaire to assess the efficacy, acceptability and compliance with these two different regimens. Twenty-two women in each group were calculated to show a 5% difference with a significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.9. The chi2-test was used to compare the two groups and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Ninety-six women were included; 66 (68.75%) (mean age 57.5 years) responded to our questionnaire. Twenty-seven had a starting dose of 2.5 mg oxybutynin twice a day and 39 of 5 mg nocte. 34.8% complained of side effects. Only 19 (43.2%) out of the 44, not on medication anymore abandoned oxybutynin for adverse reactions. Most of the patients stopped oxybutynin within 4 months. 53.0% reported improvement or cure. 39.4% denied any benefit and 7.6% (none still on oxybutynin) did not answer. The two groups did not differ for duration of treatment, improvement with oxybutynin, maximum dose they reached, the present dose, and the present urinary symptoms.
CONCLUSION: This study did not show any advantage in efficacy or compliance with oxybutynin when two different regimens of low starting were used. Two-thirds of patients discontinued the therapy within 4-6 months. Therefore, patients on anticholinergics should be reassessed after 6 months in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15808387     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Adverse Events Associated with Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Gaelen P Adam; Katherine Corsi; Amanda Mogul; Thomas A Trikalinos; Peter C Jeppson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Women's perspective of botulinum toxin treatment for overactive bladder symptoms.

Authors:  G Alessandro Digesu; Demetri Panayi; Caroline Hendricken; Michelle Camarata; Ruwan Fernando; Vikram Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Novel biomarkers for overactive bladder.

Authors:  Rufus Cartwright; Iram Afshan; Alexandros Derpapas; Gopalan Vijaya; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Persistence and compliance with medication management in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Authors:  Tae Heon Kim; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-03-11

5.  Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered.

Authors:  Sanne A L van Leijsen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Ben Willem J Mol; Suzan R Broekhuis; Fred L Milani; C Huub van der Vaart; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers; Jan den Boon; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Viviane Dietz; Jan H Kleinjan; Hans A M Brölmann; Eveline J Roos; Judith Schaafstra; John P F A Heesakkers; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.