OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the obstetric outcome of patients without obstetric risks, who had two or more previous caesarean sections (C/S) prior to the current pregnancy, which was managed by caesarean section in our obstetric department. METHODS: We studied the case notes of 602 women who had a repeat caesarean section in our unit between May 2002-June 2003. We then compared the two groups: (1) those who had two or more previous caesarean sections and (2) those who had only one previous caesarean section. RESULTS: In the study group, while dense intraperitoneal adhesions were present in 3.6% of the patients, they were not found in control group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Uterine wound separation rate was 1.9% in the study group and none of the patients in control group had uterine wound separation, which was statistically significant also (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant association between Apgar scores and number of previous caesarean sections. Postoperative complication rates did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients without any obstetric risks, with two or more previous caesarean sections had significantly more dense adhesions and uterine wound separations in the current caesarean section compared to patients with one previous caesarean section. But, maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity in women who have two or more previous caesarean sections did not differ from the patients with one previous caesarean section.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the obstetric outcome of patients without obstetric risks, who had two or more previous caesarean sections (C/S) prior to the current pregnancy, which was managed by caesarean section in our obstetric department. METHODS: We studied the case notes of 602 women who had a repeat caesarean section in our unit between May 2002-June 2003. We then compared the two groups: (1) those who had two or more previous caesarean sections and (2) those who had only one previous caesarean section. RESULTS: In the study group, while dense intraperitoneal adhesions were present in 3.6% of the patients, they were not found in control group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Uterine wound separation rate was 1.9% in the study group and none of the patients in control group had uterine wound separation, which was statistically significant also (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant association between Apgar scores and number of previous caesarean sections. Postoperative complication rates did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:Patients without any obstetric risks, with two or more previous caesarean sections had significantly more dense adhesions and uterine wound separations in the current caesarean section compared to patients with one previous caesarean section. But, maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity in women who have two or more previous caesarean sections did not differ from the patients with one previous caesarean section.