Literature DB >> 15807747

Conceptions of evidence, evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice and their use in nursing: independent nurse prescribers' views.

Maggi Banning1.   

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' conceptions of evidence and evidence-based practice, whether there are differences between evidence-based practice and evidence-based medicine and to identify the uptake of research evidence in the workplace.
BACKGROUND: The use and comprehension of the term 'evidence-based practice' in relation to nursing shows remarkable variation. Numerous definitions are provided, some tend to be closely related to the concept 'evidence-based medicine'. Independent nurse prescribers need to be able to understand the concept of evidence-based practice to utilize and apply this concept in order to provide adequate medication management of their patients.
METHOD: Data were generated by focus group interview and open question questionnaire and analysed by analytical abstraction.
RESULTS: Nurses offered a variety of views on the use and uptake of evidence in the workplace. Some nurses acknowledged that they did not read research papers but were aware that they used a lot of evidence in their practice. Nurses had difficulty differentiating evidence-based practice from evidence-based medicine.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses were familiar with the research process but not the canons of evidenced-based practice. The data generated indicate different levels of evidence are used by nurses. This may be a reflection of the level of intrigue of the nurses involved. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The education and training of independent nurse prescribers should include the exploration of evidence from randomized controlled trials and from naturalistic studies and their contribution to evidenced-based practice and evidence-based medicine. Both concepts need to be explored in relation to the medication management of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15807747     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01086.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review for librarians of evidence-based practice in nursing and the allied health professions in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Kronenfeld; Priscilla L Stephenson; Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu; Elizabeth M Tweed; Eric L Sauers; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Ruiling Guo; Henry Trahan; Kristine M Alpi; Beth Hill; Pamela Sherwill-Navarro; Margaret Peg Allen; Priscilla L Stephenson; Linda M Hartman; Judy Burnham; Dennis Fell; Michael Kronenfeld; Raymond Pavlick; Ellen W MacNaughton; Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

2.  Evidence-based practice and its associated factors among point-of-care nurses working at the teaching and specialized hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia: A concurrent study.

Authors:  Abebe Birhanu Degu; Tesfahun Melese Yilma; Miftah Abdella Beshir; Anushia Inthiran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Drug information resources used by nurse practitioners and collaborating physicians at the point of care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a survey and review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea L Murphy; Mark Fleming; Ruth Martin-Misener; Ingrid S Sketris; Mary MacCara; David Gass
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2006-07-06

4.  Clinical Physicians' Attitudes towards Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) and Their Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Jianan Hong; Jing Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.