Literature DB >> 1580756

Evaluation of the latex agglutination test for detection of Clostridium difficile.

W F Kelly1, K J Wait, P H Gilligan.   

Abstract

We compared two Clostridium difficile latex agglutination tests, Meritec from Meridian Diagnostic (Cincinnati, Ohio) and CDT from Becton-Dickinson (Cockeysville, Md), on 289 specimens submitted for tissue culture cytotoxicity using MRC-5 cells. When compared with CDT, the Meritec latex agglutination test had a sensitivity of 90% (26/29), a specificity of 97% (251/260), and a correlation of 96%. Meritec was compared with tissue culture cytotoxicity on 357 specimens. Meritec had a sensitivity of 77% (30/39), a specificity of 93% (298/318), and a correlation of 92%. Clinical review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity minus patients revealed one likely, two probable, and seven doubtful cases of C difficile disease. In contrast, review of 10 Meritec +/- tissue culture cytotoxicity plus patients showed seven likely and three probable cases of C difficile disease. The Meritec is comparable with the CDT latex agglutination test, but is not nearly as sensitive as either tissue culture assay or culture for detection of C difficile disease. A positive latex agglutination test should be confirmed by a tissue culture cytotoxicity assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1580756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of culture, cytotoxin assay and two EIA tests with clinical diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  M Binning; M A John; B C Schieven; T W Austin; R Lannigan; Z Hussain
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-07

2.  Multicenter evaluation of four methods for Clostridium difficile detection: ImmunoCard C. difficile, cytotoxin assay, culture, and latex agglutination.

Authors:  J L Staneck; L S Weckbach; S D Allen; J A Siders; P H Gilligan; G Coppitt; J A Kraft; D H Willis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: current strategies for diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Munshi Moyenuddin; John C Williamson; Christopher A Ohl
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis.

Authors:  F C Knoop; M Owens; I C Crocker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Evaluation of four commercially available enzyme immunoassays for laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diseases.

Authors:  S Whittier; D S Shapiro; W F Kelly; T P Walden; K J Wait; L T McMillon; P H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of four methods in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease.

Authors:  A R Mattia; G V Doern; J Clark; J Holden; L Wu; M J Ferraro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.