Literature DB >> 15807405

Comparing study of the effect of nanosized silicon dioxide and microsized silicon dioxide on fibrogenesis in rats.

Ying Chen1, Jie Chen, Jing Dong, Yihe Jin.   

Abstract

This study compares the effect of nanosized silicon dioxide (nanosized SiO2) and microsized silicon dioxide (microsized SiO2) particles on fibrogenesis in rats. Wistar rats were instilled intratracheally with saline, 20 mg of nanosized SiO2 or 20 mg of microsized SiO2, and were sacrificed at 1 and 2 months after instillation. The lungs of rats were analysed for the changes of lung/body coefficient and hydroxyproline content. Changes in pathology and fibrotic grade were observed by use of hematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson dyeing. The expression of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) was observed by use of immunohistochemical technique, and protein expression quantitatively analysed by image analysis. The lung/body coefficient and hydroxyproline content of nanosized SiO2 groups were significantly lower than those of microsized SiO2 groups at both 1 and 2 months after instillation (P<0.05 or P<0.01), but without significant differences from those of saline control groups. At 1 month after instillation, there were mainly cellular nodules (Stage I) in nanosized SiO2 group, while in microsized SiO2 group Stage II, II+ of silicotic nodules were observed. At 2 months after instillation, there were still Stage I of silicotic nodules in nanosized SiO2 group. In microsized SiO2 group mainly Stage II+, III of silicotic nodules were found. Quantity image analysis showed that the expressions of IL-4 and TGF-beta1 in nanosized SiO2 groups were significantly lower than those in microsized SiO2 groups (P<0.01), but without significant difference from those of saline control groups. Our experiment revealed that the effect of fibrogenesis of nanosized SiO2 might be milder than that of microsized SiO2 in rats, potentially resulting from nanoparticals tending to be diffused and easily translocated due to their ultrafine particle size compared to microsized particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15807405     DOI: 10.1191/0748233704th190oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health        ISSN: 0748-2337            Impact factor:   2.273


  22 in total

1.  Macrophage responses to silica nanoparticles are highly conserved across particle sizes.

Authors:  Katrina M Waters; Lisa M Masiello; Richard C Zangar; Barbara J Tarasevich; Norman J Karin; Ryan D Quesenberry; Somnath Bandyopadhyay; Justin G Teeguarden; Joel G Pounds; Brian D Thrall
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Pulmonary applications and toxicity of engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Card; Darryl C Zeldin; James C Bonner; Earle R Nestmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.464

3.  Iron(III)-doped, silica nanoshells: a biodegradable form of silica.

Authors:  Kristina K Pohaku Mitchell; Alexander Liberman; Andrew C Kummel; William C Trogler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Low dose inflammatory potential of silica particles in human-derived THP-1 macrophage cell culture studies - Mechanism and effects of particle size and iron.

Authors:  Gayatri Premshekharan; Kennedy Nguyen; Hongqiao Zhang; Henry Jay Forman; Valerie Jean Leppert
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.192

5.  SiO2 nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity and protein expression alteration in HaCaT cells.

Authors:  Xifei Yang; Jianjun Liu; Haowei He; Li Zhou; Chunmei Gong; Xiaomei Wang; Lingqing Yang; Jianhui Yuan; Haiyan Huang; Lianhua He; Bing Zhang; Zhixiong Zhuang
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Effects of amorphous silica coating on cerium oxide nanoparticles induced pulmonary responses.

Authors:  Jane Ma; Robert R Mercer; Mark Barger; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Joel M Cohen; Philip Demokritou; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Toxic Impacts of Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles on Liver and Kidney of Male Adult Rats: an In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Rehab A Azouz; Reda M S Korany
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Nano-Therapeutics for the Lung: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Roshni Iyer; Connie C W Hsia; Kytai T Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Phenol as a novel sclerosing agent: A safety and efficacy study on experimental animals.

Authors:  Khalid M Alghamdi; Abdelkader E Ashour; Ammar C Rikabi; Noura A Moussa
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Toxic and teratogenic silica nanowires in developing vertebrate embryos.

Authors:  Steve M Nelson; Tarek Mahmoud; Miles Beaux; Pamela Shapiro; David N McIlroy; Deborah L Stenkamp
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.