Literature DB >> 15805868

Usefulness of delayed postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty.

D Ayache1, M T Williams, D Lejeune, A Corré.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Imaging takes an increasing place in the follow-up of patients who have undergone surgery for cholesteatoma, with computed tomography (CT) as the first line imaging technique. However, in case of complete opacity of the tympanomastoid cavities, CT is not able to differentiate residual cholesteatoma from postoperative scar tissue. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using delayed postcontrast T1-weighted images for the detection of residual cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty (CWU) in cases where CT was not conclusive. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study.
METHODS: MRI, with delayed postcontrast T1-weighted images (30-45 minutes after contrast injection), was performed before revision surgery in 41 consecutive patients who had undergone CWU for cholesteatoma and presenting with a nonspecific complete opacity of the mastoid bowl on CT. In all the cases, imaging results were compared with operative findings at surgical revision.
RESULTS: A residual cholesteatoma was found in 19 of 41 patients at revision surgery and was correctly detected on MRI in 17 patients. In the two remaining cases, cholesteatoma pearls smaller than 3 mm were not seen. There was no false-positive case. Statistics were as follows: sensitivity 90%; specificity 100%; positive predictive value 100%; negative predictive value 92%.
CONCLUSION: When postoperative CT is not conclusive because of complete opacity of the tympanomastoid cavities, MRI with delayed postcontrast T1-weighted images is a reliable additional technique for the detection of a residual cholesteatoma when its diameter is at least 3 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15805868     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000161360.66191.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone.

Authors:  B De Foer; J-P Vercruysse; M Spaepen; T Somers; M Pouillon; E Offeciers; J W Casselman
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas.

Authors:  K Baráth; A M Huber; P Stämpfli; Z Varga; S Kollias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the management of cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Mudit Jindal; Jayesh Doshi; Manoj Srivastav; David Wilcock; Richard Irving; Ranit De
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma evaluation.

Authors:  K M Schwartz; J I Lane; B D Bolster; B A Neff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  All about Imagistic Exploration in Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Mariana Coman; Alexandru Coman; Dan-Cristian Gheorghe
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-06

6.  The value of single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of middle ear cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Bert De Foer; Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Anja Bernaerts; Joachim Maes; Filip Deckers; Johan Michiels; Thomas Somers; Marc Pouillon; Erwin Offeciers; Jan W Casselman
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Use of non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of cholesteatomas in high-risk tympanic retraction pockets.

Authors:  A Alvo; C Garrido; Á Salas; G Miranda; C E Stott; P H Delano
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in cholesteatoma: the Indian experience.

Authors:  Sanjay Vaid; Yogesh Kamble; Neelam Vaid; Sumit Bhatti; Sudarshan Rawat; Avinash Nanivadekar; Sandeep Karmarkar
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-12-16

9.  Comparison of echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging for the detection of residual cholesteatoma.

Authors:  F Venail; A Bonafe; V Poirrier; M Mondain; A Uziel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Vercruysse; Bert De Foer; Marc Pouillon; Thomas Somers; Jan Casselman; Erwin Offeciers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.