Literature DB >> 15805142

Identifying the sick: can biochemical measurements be used to aid decision making on presentation to the accident and emergency department.

T R Hucker1, G P Mitchell, L D Blake, E Cheek, V Bewick, M Grocutt, L G Forni, R M Venn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate identification of patients who may benefit from aggressive optimal medical intervention is essential if improved outcomes in terms of survival are to be achieved. We studied the usefulness of routine clinical measurements and/or markers of metabolic abnormality in the early identification of those patients at greatest risk of deterioration on presentation to the accident and emergency department.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in the accident and emergency department of a 602-bed district general hospital. Routine clinical measurements (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation in room air, level of consciousness and ventilatory frequency) and venous blood analysis for metabolic markers (pH, bicarbonate, standard base excess, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap) and biochemical markers (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Cl-, PO4- albumin, urea and creatinine) were recorded from unselected consecutive hospital admissions over two 3-month periods (September-November 2002 and February-April 2003).
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that neither conventional clinical measurements upon presentation to the accident and emergency department nor venous biochemical and metabolic indices have good discriminatory ability when used as single predictors of either hospital mortality or length of hospital stay. Selecting variables from all the clinical and venous blood measurements gave a parsimonious model containing only age, heart rate, phosphate and albumin (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.82 [95% CI 0.76, 0.87]).
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of clinical and venous biochemical measurements in the accident and emergency department proved the best predictors of hospital mortality. Consequently, they may be helpful as a triage tool in the accident and emergency department to help identify patients at risk of deterioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15805142     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  14 in total

1.  Predicting cardiac arrest on the wards: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Michael T Huber; Seo Young Park; Jesse B Hall; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  The anion gap does not accurately screen for lactic acidosis in emergency department patients.

Authors:  B D Adams; T A Bonzani; C J Hunter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Lactate versus non-lactate metabolic acidosis: a retrospective outcome evaluation of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Kyle J Gunnerson; Melissa Saul; Shui He; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Development of a tool for defining and identifying the dying patient in hospital: Criteria for Screening and Triaging to Appropriate aLternative care (CriSTAL).

Authors:  Magnolia Cardona-Morrell; Ken Hillman
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.568

5.  Index blood tests and national early warning scores within 24 hours of emergency admission can predict the risk of in-hospital mortality: a model development and validation study.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Gavin Rudge; Duncan Watson; Gordon Wood; Gary B Smith; David R Prytherch; Alan Girling; Andrew Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Which is more useful in predicting hospital mortality--dichotomised blood test results or actual test values? A retrospective study in two hospitals.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Gavin Rudge; Gordon Wood; Gary Smith; Vishal Nangalia; David Prytherch; Roger Holder; Jim Briggs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Recently published papers: predictors, pressors and poietins.

Authors:  Suzannah Ward; Richard Venn
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Don't take vitals, take a lactate.

Authors:  Jan Bakker; Tim C Jansen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Patients Hospitalized in General Wards via the Emergency Department: Early Identification of Predisposing Factors for Death or Unexpected Intensive Care Unit Admission-A Historical Prospective.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Isabelle Runge; Nathalie Delorme; Angèle Bouju; Antoine Valéry
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 1.112

Review 10.  Anion gap as a prognostic tool for risk stratification in critically ill patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stella Andrea Glasmacher; William Stones
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.