Literature DB >> 1580316

A comparison of retrieval effectiveness for three methods of indexing medical literature.

W R Hersh1, D H Hickam.   

Abstract

Conventional approaches to indexing medical literature include the human assignment of terms from a controlled vocabulary, such as MeSH, or the computer assignment of all words in the title and abstract as indexing terms. Human indexing suffers from inconsistency, while word-based indexing suffers from the multiple meanings of words. SAPHIRE is a computer program designed to provide indexing using controlled terms that are assigned by computer, based on their occurrence in the title and abstract. In this first evaluation of SAPHIRE, the authors compared the retrieval performance of the three indexing approaches--human-based MEDLINE with text words; machine-based SAPHIRE with text words; and text words only--for searches by measuring recall and precision for each search using a test collection of 200 abstracts. The abstracts were judged by human reviewers for relevance as applied to 12 literature queries. The results suggest that text word indexing is more effective than indexing with MeSH terms. SAPHIRE's indexing performance was slightly inferior but the program has other advantageous features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1580316     DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199205000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  13 in total

1.  Knowledge requirements for automated inference of medical textbook markup.

Authors:  D C Berrios; A Kehler; L M Fagan
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  UMLS concept indexing for production databases: a feasibility study.

Authors:  P Nadkarni; R Chen; C Brandt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Words, concepts, or both: optimal indexing units for automated information retrieval.

Authors:  W R Hersh; D H Hickam; T J Leone
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

4.  A comparative evaluation of full-text, concept-based, and context-sensitive search.

Authors:  Robert Moskovitch; Susana B Martins; Eytan Behiri; Aviram Weiss; Yuval Shahar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Updating a bibliography using the related articles function within PubMed.

Authors:  X Liu; R B Altman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

6.  Searching for information on the Internet using the UMLS and Medical World Search.

Authors:  H H Suarez; X Hao; I F Chang
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

7.  A performance and failure analysis of SAPHIRE with a MEDLINE test collection.

Authors:  W R Hersh; D H Hickam; R B Haynes; K A McKibbon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Contextual models of clinical publications for enhancing retrieval from full-text databases.

Authors:  G P Purcell; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

9.  Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting.

Authors:  W Hersh; D Hickam
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-10

10.  Personalized online information search and visualization.

Authors:  Dongquan Chen; Helmuth F Orthner; Susan M Sell
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.