Literature DB >> 15803086

A systematic review of sociodemographic, physical, and psychological predictors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or, back school treatment outcome in patients with chronic low back pain.

Marije van der Hulst1, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Maarten J Ijzerman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A systematic review.
OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or back school treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous reviews have been performed to gain insight into which patients benefit from which treatment. However, no review has systematically focused on predictors from multiple domains (i.e., sociodemographic, physical, and psychological), or on treatment outcome measured as activity limitation or participation restriction.
METHODS: Studies were found by searching medical and psychological databases, and screening references. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality using standard criteria. Studies were only included if they met a predefined level of internal validity. A qualitative analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Heterogeneity among studies in patient characteristics, predictors, treatment, and outcomes limited evidence. All reviewed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature. Consistent evidence was found for the predictive value of pain intensity (more pain--> worse outcome), several work-related parameters (e.g., high satisfaction--> better outcome), and coping style (less active coping--> better outcome). Other sociodemographic and physical variables consistently lacked predictive value. No consistent evidence was found for other psychological variables.
CONCLUSIONS: It is impossible to define a generic set of predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and back schools for patients with chronic low back pain because the reviewed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature, and most predictors were only studied once. Nevertheless, for several predictors, consistent evidence was found. Large confirmatory studies are needed to test the value of these predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15803086     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157414.47713.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  43 in total

1.  Long-term effects of a cognitive-behavioral training program for the management of depressive symptoms among patients in orthopedic inpatient rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lisa Tlach; Petra Hampel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Hellum; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Øyvind Gjertsen; Linda Berg; Gesche Neckelmann; Oliver Grundnes; Ivar Rossvoll; Jan Sture Skouen; Jens Ivar Brox; Kjersti Storheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Patients with low back pain. Psychosocial work-related factors and return to work - a literature review].

Authors:  M Bethge
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Representations: an important key to understanding workers' coping behaviors during rehabilitation and the return-to-work process.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Raymond Baril; Marie-José Durand; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-13

5.  Effects of gender and cognitive-behavioral management of depressive symptoms on rehabilitation outcome among inpatient orthopedic patients with chronic low back pain: a 1 year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Petra Hampel; Thomas Graef; Bernhard Krohn-Grimberghe; Lisa Tlach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.

Authors:  Scott D Tagliaferri; Maia Angelova; Xiaohui Zhao; Patrick J Owen; Clint T Miller; Tim Wilkin; Daniel L Belavy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-07-09

7.  Exploring the contribution of patient-reported and clinician based variables for the prediction of low back work status.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Jon J Ford; Joan M McMeeken; Alexander Chan; Henrica C W de Vet; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-15

8.  Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; David Cassidy; Ivan Steensta; Sophie Soklaridis; Eleanor Boyle; Stephanie Eng; Hamer Howard; Bains Bhupinder; Pierre Côté
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  "My lung disease won't go away, it's there to stay": profiles of adaptation to functional limitations in workers with asthma and COPD.

Authors:  C R L Boot; N J A van Exel; J W J van der Gulden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-09

10.  Expectations, perceptions, and physiotherapy predict prolonged sick leave in subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Silje E Reme; Eli M Hagen; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.