PURPOSE: To determine the location of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMs) in the arterial vasculature of nasopharyngeal angiofibromas (NAFs) and paragangliomas (PGs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine specimens (25 PGs and 24 NAFs) treated operatively after embolization with TGMs of various sizes (100-300 microm to 900-1200 microm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin saffron and analyzed at an objective magnification of 10 or 20 with a micrometric eyepiece (magnification, x12.5). The diameter of occluded vessels, their localization (intra- or extratumoral), and the number and diameter of TGMs they contained were determined. RESULTS: Embolized vessels (N = 1125) were measured: 440 in PGs and 685 in NAFs. Vessels were 89% intratumoral and 11% extratumoral. The diameter of the occluded vessels increased significantly with the size range of TGMs used for embolization for each tumor type (P < .0001). Intratumoral occluded vessels were significantly smaller than extratumoral vessels (P < .0001). Distribution of TGMs within the vascular network (intratumoral or extratumoral location) were similar for NAFs and PGs. The intratumoral and extratumoral dissemination of TGMs was different when comparing 100-300-microm TGMs versus 500-700-microm TGMs (P = .0006) as well as 300-500-microm TGMs versus 500-700-microm TGMs (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The size of the vessels occluded by TGMs and their intra- or extratumoral location directly depend on the size of the injected TGMs. The vessels located inside the tumors were smaller than those located outside the tumors. A threshold for the intratumoral penetration of TGMs in the vasculature can be proposed from these data. There was no evidence of different behavior of TGMs in NAFs versus PGs.
PURPOSE: To determine the location of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TGMs) in the arterial vasculature of nasopharyngeal angiofibromas (NAFs) and paragangliomas (PGs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine specimens (25 PGs and 24 NAFs) treated operatively after embolization with TGMs of various sizes (100-300 microm to 900-1200 microm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin saffron and analyzed at an objective magnification of 10 or 20 with a micrometric eyepiece (magnification, x12.5). The diameter of occluded vessels, their localization (intra- or extratumoral), and the number and diameter of TGMs they contained were determined. RESULTS: Embolized vessels (N = 1125) were measured: 440 in PGs and 685 in NAFs. Vessels were 89% intratumoral and 11% extratumoral. The diameter of the occluded vessels increased significantly with the size range of TGMs used for embolization for each tumor type (P < .0001). Intratumoral occluded vessels were significantly smaller than extratumoral vessels (P < .0001). Distribution of TGMs within the vascular network (intratumoral or extratumoral location) were similar for NAFs and PGs. The intratumoral and extratumoral dissemination of TGMs was different when comparing 100-300-microm TGMs versus 500-700-microm TGMs (P = .0006) as well as 300-500-microm TGMs versus 500-700-microm TGMs (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The size of the vessels occluded by TGMs and their intra- or extratumoral location directly depend on the size of the injected TGMs. The vessels located inside the tumors were smaller than those located outside the tumors. A threshold for the intratumoral penetration of TGMs in the vasculature can be proposed from these data. There was no evidence of different behavior of TGMs in NAFs versus PGs.
Authors: Sumeet Virmani; Thomas K Rhee; Robert K Ryu; Kent T Sato; Robert J Lewandowski; Mary F Mulcahy; Laura M Kulik; Barbara Szolc-Kowalska; Gayle E Woloschak; Guang-Yu Yang; Riad Salem; Andrew C Larson; Reed A Omary Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Marc A Lazzaro; Aamir Badruddin; Osama O Zaidat; Ziad Darkhabani; Dhruvil J Pandya; John R Lynch Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 4.003