Literature DB >> 15802112

[Impact of common reasons for consultation on the feeling of vitality and the physical performance of the over-65s].

T Sánchez Lasheras1, N Goñi Ruiz, M Serrano-Martínez, P Buil, A Zabaleta, G de Miguel, O Beldarrain, J Díez Espino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure two functional dimensions (vitality and physical function) involved in the quality of life of the over-65s and to find what relationship they maintain with the commonest reasons for consultation.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study.
SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Randomised sample of 179 patients over 65 from 14 primary care clinics in Navarra.
METHODS: SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaire and most common reasons for consultation. Personal and family details and ongoing drug prescription were also recorded.
RESULTS: The most common reasons for consultation were insomnia (31.8%), arthrosis (48%), and urinary symptoms (16.2%). The greatest differences in the SF-36 scales occurred in patients with insomnia. In the multiple regression models, inverse associations were found for each of the reasons for consultation with the vitality and physical function dimensions. Vitality was associated with urinary symptoms, with an adjusted beta coefficient of -11.2 points (95% CI, -18.6 to -3.7). Insomnia was associated with significant decline in vitality and physical function, with beta of -7.7 points (95% CI, -13.9 to -1.5) and -10.3 points (95% CI, -19.1 to -1.6), respectively. Arthrosis symptoms behaved in a similar way.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common pathologies or symptoms causing primary care consultations in the over-65s affect significantly the quality-of-life dimensions relating to the pursuit of normal daily life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15802112      PMCID: PMC7684378          DOI: 10.1157/13072789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  27 in total

Review 1.  [The Spanish version of EuroQol: a description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale].

Authors:  X Badia; M Roset; S Montserrat; M Herdman; A Segura
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.725

2.  SF-36: evaluation of quality of life in severe and mild insomniacs compared with good sleepers.

Authors:  D Léger; K Scheuermaier; P Philip; M Paillard; C Guilleminault
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 3.  [Health questionnaire: concept and methodology].

Authors:  L Prieto; L Prieto; X Badia
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  [Health questionnaires in Spain and their use in primary care].

Authors:  X Badia; E Baró
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-09-30       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  [Evaluation in the clinic of health-related quality of life: the COOP/WONCA cartoons].

Authors:  L Lizán Tudela; A Reig Ferrer
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  The SF-36 profile and health-related quality of life: an interpretative analysis.

Authors:  A Shmueli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Epidemiology and the challenge of ageing.

Authors:  A M Davies
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  [The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results].

Authors:  J Alonso; L Prieto; J M Antó
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1995-05-27       Impact factor: 1.725

9.  Comparative health status of patients with 11 common illnesses in Wales.

Authors:  R A Lyons; S V Lo; B N Littlepage
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Testing the measurement properties of the Short Form-36 Health Survey in a frail elderly population.

Authors:  K Stadnyk; J Calder; K Rockwood
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.