Literature DB >> 15801360

Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

S F Wyler1, A Bachmann, R Casella, T Gasser, T Sulser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Retroperitoneoscopy is an established procedure for renal surgery. We evaluated our results with retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 14 female and 10 male patients, a retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty was performed (13 right/11 left). Four patients had previously had an endopyelotomy. The operation was performed using standard retroperitoneoscopic technique with the patient in a flank position. After preparation of the ureter and renal pelvis, the UPJ was resected in 22 patients in an Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Twenty of these patients had a crossing vessel. The other two patients, who had small renal pelves, were operated on with a Fenger pyeloplasty. In all patients a 7F double-J stent was placed.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 189 minutes (range 70-360 minutes), and the average blood loss was 110 mL (range 50-400 mL). There were no intraoperative complications, although one patient with adhesions and scarring after previous endopyelotomy had to be converted to open surgery. The transurethral catheter was left for 7 days in the first 10 cases and for 4 days in the 14 subsequent patients. The hospitalization time was 9.7 and 7.5 days, respectively. The only postoperative complication was a urinoma, which was punctured. The double-J catheter was removed after an average of 4.6 weeks (range 4-8 weeks). Intravenous urography 6 weeks later showed no obstruction. The mean follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 1-24 months) with no signs of obstruction on ultrasonography.
CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction is a safe and effective procedure. Our short-term results are similar to those of open pyeloplasty with the advantage of a minimally invasive approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15801360     DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  [Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery. Indications, technique, and results after 360 procedures].

Authors:  S Wyler; A Bachmann; B Weltzien; T Gasser; R Ruszat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the standard of care for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Experience with retroperitoneoscopy in pediatric surgical oncology.

Authors:  Till M Theilen; Thambipillai Sri Paran; Daniel Rutigliano; Leonard Wexler; Yukio Sonoda; Michael P LaQuaglia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.