Literature DB >> 15801247

Monitoring nebulizer use in children: comparison of electronic and asthma diary data.

Arlene M Butz1, Michele Donithan, Mary E Bollinger, Cynthia Rand, Richard E Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of nebulizer medication adherence that relies on self-report of medication use is subject to recall bias and increased patient burden. Electronic monitoring of nebulizer medication use is relatively new technology and provides an objective measure of nebulizer use.
OBJECTIVE: To examine levels of agreement for nebulizer use between self-report on diary cards and electronic monitor data in young inner-city children with asthma.
METHODS: Of 221 enrolled children with persistent asthma, 157 (71%) provided 12 weeks of diary card and nebulizer monitor recordings that were matched by date across days and by patient. Concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficients were calculated between self-report and electronic data.
RESULTS: The children were predominantly African American (89%) and male (66%), with a mean age of 4.6 years. Their persistent asthma was categorized as mild (61%) or moderate to severe (35%). Concordance between diary and electronic data was 85%, with overreporting on diary cards noted on 15% of the total days. Sensitivity of the diary data relative to the electronic data ranged from 0.80 to 0.91 during the 12-week study. Diary return rates decreased from 75% during the initial 3 weeks to 44% at 12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Electronic monitoring of nebulizer use provides a more precise measure of long-term medication use than does self-report on diary cards, and it is feasible for use in high-risk populations. However, diary cards seem to be a valid alternative for short-term monitoring of nebulizer use, resulting in only a slight overestimation of medication use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15801247     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60988-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of nebulizer use-targeted asthma education on underserved children with asthma.

Authors:  Arlene M Butz; Mona G Tsoukleris; Michele Donithan; Van Doren Hsu; Ilene Zuckerman; Kim Elizabeth Mudd; Richard E Thompson; Cindy Rand; Mary Elizabeth Bollinger
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2006-06

Review 2.  Electronic measurement of medication adherence in pediatric chronic illness: a review of measures.

Authors:  Lisa M Ingerski; Elizabeth A Hente; Avani C Modi; Kevin A Hommel
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Cost effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy versus salmeterol/fluticasone plus salbutamol in the treatment of asthma.

Authors:  Gunnar Johansson; Emma B Andreasson; Per E Larsson; Claus F Vogelmeier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Medication adherence in the asthmatic child and adolescent.

Authors:  Mauli Desai; John J Oppenheimer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Rates of long-term cochlear implant use in children.

Authors:  Kevin James Contrera; Janet Seolin Choi; Caitlin Rebecca Blake; Joshua Francis Betz; John Kim Niparko; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Brief-interval telephone surveys of medication adherence and asthma symptoms in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Continuation Study.

Authors:  Bruce G Bender; Allison Rankin; Zung Vu Tran; Frederick S Wamboldt
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 7.  Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology.

Authors:  Alexandra L Quittner; Avani C Modi; Kathleen L Lemanek; Carolyn E Ievers-Landis; Michael A Rapoff
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2007-09-10

Review 8.  Health information technology to facilitate communication involving health care providers, caregivers, and pediatric patients: a scoping review.

Authors:  Stephen James Gentles; Cynthia Lokker; K Ann McKibbon
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of providing essential medicines at no charge: the Carefully seLected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medicines (CLEAN Meds) trial.

Authors:  Nav Persaud; Taehoon Lee; Haroon Ahmad; Winny Li; Michael Sergio Taglione; Yathavan Rajakulasingam; Norman Umali; Andrew Boozary; Richard H Glazier; Tara Gomes; Stephen W Hwang; Peter Jüni; Michael Law; Muhammad M Mamdani; Braden Manns; Danielle Martin; Steve Morgan; Paul Oh; Andrew David Pinto; Baiju R Shah; Frank M Sullivan; Kevin E Thorpe; Karen Tu; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.