Literature DB >> 15800755

Should we resurface the patella in total knee replacement? Experience with the Nex Gen prothesis.

J Tabutin1, F Banon, Y Catonne, J Grobost, J L Tessier, B Tillie.   

Abstract

Patellar resurfacing is a controversial issue in primary total knee replacement. So, we took advantage of a large study to try and answer this question. An open prospective multicentric study was conducted about the outcome of the Nex Gen Total Knee prosthesis with clinical and radiological follow-up at regular intervals (1, 2 and 5 years). The data were centrally collected and analyzed by independent observers. A total of whole 5,915 cases were included (487 in the French group); incidences of patello-femoral pain were observed in both French and international groups and compared between cases with or without resurfaced patellae. Only osteoarthritic cases were selected for this particular study. Statistical analysis was performed using a Pearson's Chi-square test with a 95% confidence interval. The frequency of preoperative pain was significantly higher in the French group; 85.1% versus 66.6% (p<0.05). No patello-femoral pain appeared in preoperatively painless patients in the French group. The frequency of lateral patellar release was similar in both groups. 35.7% of the patellae were resurfaced in the international group versus 98.8% in the French one. At 2 years, patello-femoral pain was observed in 6.3% of cases in the former group versus 0.7% in the latter one. The risk of having patello-femoral pain was 9.45 times higher in the international group. When considering resurfaced cases in both groups the risk of having anterior knee pain was not significantly different (p=0.35). In the French group, one case out of nine (11.1%) with patello-femoral pain had not been resurfaced, while 129 cases out of 151 (85.4%) had not had a resurfacing in the international group. This emphasizes the effect of patellar implant on pain. Although patello-femoral pain is multifactorial, this analysis tool is powerful in getting rid of the "center effect " (cf Swedish register). Even if a longer follow-up for confirmation is needed, our data favor patellar resurfacing with this type of implant in spite of the fact that the trochlear design was considered as anatomical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15800755     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0571-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  12 in total

1.  Effect of femoral component designs on the contact and tracking characteristics of the unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Tanzer; C A McLean; E Laxer; J Casey; A M Ahmed
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements.

Authors:  P A Keblish; A K Varma; A S Greenwald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-11

3.  Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; T Schrader; A J Bertot; M W Wolfe; L Myers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  G D Picetti; W A McGann; R B Welch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J E Enis; R Gardner; M A Robledo; L Latta; R Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement.

Authors:  R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; M Vaz; J Kramer; R Hardie; D Robertson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Computer-assisted decision analysis in orthopedics: resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty as an example.

Authors:  P Zangger; A Detsky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden.

Authors:  O Robertsson; M Dunbar; T Pehrsson; K Knutson; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-06

9.  Should the patella be resurfaced in total knee arthroplasty? Efficacy of patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  W Abraham; J R Buchanan; H Daubert; R B Greer; J Keefer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  K A Levitsky; W J Harris; J McManus; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuzhen Li; Yueping Chen; Wei Su; Jinmin Zhao; Shunqing He; Xiangping Luo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Patellar resurfacing versus patellar retention in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Stefano Zaffagnini; Massimo Berruto; Kristian Samuelsson; Eleonor Svantesson; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Does patella resurfacing really matter? Pain and function in 972 patients after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif Ivar Havelin; Stein Emil Vollset; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  An alternative patellar resurfacing technique in knee replacement: patellofemoral fascial interposition arthroplasty.

Authors:  Volkan Oztuna; Vasfi Karatosun; Bayram Unver; Irfan Ayan; Fehmi Kuyurtar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patellar resurfacing in posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty (PATRES): design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Maria J F J Bischoff; Tom M van Raaij; Inge H F Reininga; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.