PURPOSE: This phase II study investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab monotherapy given as first-line treatment once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated HER2-positive MBC received a loading dose of trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and then 6 mg/kg IV at 3-week intervals until disease progression or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: In total, 105 patients received a median of five cycles of therapy (range, 1 to 35+). The overall response rate was 19% (23% in patients with measurable centrally confirmed immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] -positive disease) and clinical benefit rate (complete and partial responses plus stable disease for at least 6 months) was 33% (36% in patients with measurable centrally confirmed IHC 3+ and/or FISH-positive disease). Median time to progression was 3.4 months (range, 0.6 to 23.6 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were rigors, pyrexia, headache, nausea, and fatigue. Median baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 63%; this did not significantly change over the course of the study. The average exposure to trastuzumab observed in this study was similar to that in previous studies of the weekly regimen. However, as expected, mean trough trastuzumab concentrations were lower and peak levels were higher with 3-weekly trastuzumab compared with weekly treatments. CONCLUSION: Administering higher doses on a 3-weekly schedule did not compromise the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive MBC, and average exposure was similar to that observed with weekly therapy. Three-weekly trastuzumab may represent a convenient alternative to weekly administration.
PURPOSE: This phase II study investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab monotherapy given as first-line treatment once every 3 weeks (3-weekly) in women with humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated HER2-positive MBC received a loading dose of trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) and then 6 mg/kg IV at 3-week intervals until disease progression or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: In total, 105 patients received a median of five cycles of therapy (range, 1 to 35+). The overall response rate was 19% (23% in patients with measurable centrally confirmed immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+ and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH] -positive disease) and clinical benefit rate (complete and partial responses plus stable disease for at least 6 months) was 33% (36% in patients with measurable centrally confirmed IHC 3+ and/or FISH-positive disease). Median time to progression was 3.4 months (range, 0.6 to 23.6 months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were rigors, pyrexia, headache, nausea, and fatigue. Median baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was 63%; this did not significantly change over the course of the study. The average exposure to trastuzumab observed in this study was similar to that in previous studies of the weekly regimen. However, as expected, mean trough trastuzumab concentrations were lower and peak levels were higher with 3-weekly trastuzumab compared with weekly treatments. CONCLUSION: Administering higher doses on a 3-weekly schedule did not compromise the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive MBC, and average exposure was similar to that observed with weekly therapy. Three-weekly trastuzumab may represent a convenient alternative to weekly administration.
Authors: Gabrielle Rocque; Adedayo Onitilo; Jessica Engel; Erica Pettke; Alice Boshoven; Kyungmann Kim; Shailly Rishi; Bonnie Waack; Kari B Wisinski; Amye Tevaarwerk; Mark E Burkard Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Eleni M Karapanagiotou; Victoria Roulstone; Katie Twigger; Mercel Ball; Maryanne Tanay; Chris Nutting; Kate Newbold; Martin E Gore; James Larkin; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Matt Coffey; Brad Thompson; Karl Mettinger; Richard G Vile; Hardev S Pandha; Geoff D Hall; Alan A Melcher; John Chester; Kevin J Harrington Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas E Delea; Carol Hawkes; Mayur M Amonkar; Konstantinos Lykopoulos; Stephen R D Johnston Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Chia C Portera; Janice M Walshe; Douglas R Rosing; Neelima Denduluri; Arlene W Berman; Ujala Vatas; Margarita Velarde; Catherine K Chow; Seth M Steinberg; Diana Nguyen; Sherry X Yang; Sandra M Swain Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nicolas Martin; Nicolas Isambert; Carlos Gomez-Roca; Rainer-Georg Goeldner; Sylvie Zanetta; Behbood Sadrolhefazi; Hélène de Mont-Serrat; Mario Campone; Jean-Pierre Delord Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Carlos L Arteaga; Anne O'Neill; Stacy L Moulder; Michael Pins; Joseph A Sparano; George W Sledge; Nancy E Davidson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531