BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a major determinant of health. There is little research on if or how general practitioners assess this in individual patients and use it in their clinical practice. METHODS: An exploratory pilot study was conducted using qualitative methodology. Telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 11 GPs. RESULTS: The participating GPs commonly assessed SES through observation of patient behaviour and presentation, contextualised with knowledge of the patient's background and the community, rather than direct enquiry. The GPs understood the link between low SES and poor health primarily in terms of a higher prevalence of behavioural risk factors. Participating GPs were generally pessimistic about achieving behaviour change for patients they identified as being of low SES. DISCUSSION: General practitioners' complex understanding of SES is supported by newer theories of health inequalities and social position. However, GP attitudes may potentially play a role in reinforcing inequalities. Further research is needed regarding the relationship between GP perceptions and objective indicators of SES.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a major determinant of health. There is little research on if or how general practitioners assess this in individual patients and use it in their clinical practice. METHODS: An exploratory pilot study was conducted using qualitative methodology. Telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 11 GPs. RESULTS: The participating GPs commonly assessed SES through observation of patient behaviour and presentation, contextualised with knowledge of the patient's background and the community, rather than direct enquiry. The GPs understood the link between low SES and poor health primarily in terms of a higher prevalence of behavioural risk factors. Participating GPs were generally pessimistic about achieving behaviour change for patients they identified as being of low SES. DISCUSSION: General practitioners' complex understanding of SES is supported by newer theories of health inequalities and social position. However, GP attitudes may potentially play a role in reinforcing inequalities. Further research is needed regarding the relationship between GP perceptions and objective indicators of SES.