BACKGROUND: The MMSE is a widely-used instrument in screening for dementia in the community. The traditional cut-point of <24/30 may be unsuitable for use in some settings, due to biases in age and education. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether cut-points derived from age- and education-specific norms would improve the performance of the MMSE as a screening tool for dementia and cognitive impairment in an Irish community setting, potentially reducing the number of onward referrals. A secondary aim was to obtain score norms in an Irish sample. METHODS: One thousand one hundred and fifteen people aged over 65 (mean age 74.8+/-6.8 years; 68% female) were assessed in their own homes, using MMSE (world) and the AGECAT computerised diagnostic system for mental illness in the elderly. The performance of the MMSE in identifying case- and sub-case-level dementia was investigated using cut-points of <24 and <23, as well as adjusted cut-points based on published norms and norms derived from the Irish sample. RESULTS: Published norms did not prove useful in improving screening accuracy. Cut-points based on 10th percentile Irish norms and the <23 cut-point performed comparably well, both yielding 93% specificity, with overall accuracy of 90% and 91% respectively (as sensitivity was higher for the <23 cut-point). CONCLUSIONS: Locally-derived norms yielded better screening accuracy than did published norms or the traditional <24 cut-point. The importance of selecting an appropriate percentile cut-off when using norms is discussed. The best results were obtained with a simple <23 cut-point, and this may be optimal when screening for dementia in an Irish community setting. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The MMSE is a widely-used instrument in screening for dementia in the community. The traditional cut-point of <24/30 may be unsuitable for use in some settings, due to biases in age and education. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether cut-points derived from age- and education-specific norms would improve the performance of the MMSE as a screening tool for dementia and cognitive impairment in an Irish community setting, potentially reducing the number of onward referrals. A secondary aim was to obtain score norms in an Irish sample. METHODS: One thousand one hundred and fifteen people aged over 65 (mean age 74.8+/-6.8 years; 68% female) were assessed in their own homes, using MMSE (world) and the AGECAT computerised diagnostic system for mental illness in the elderly. The performance of the MMSE in identifying case- and sub-case-level dementia was investigated using cut-points of <24 and <23, as well as adjusted cut-points based on published norms and norms derived from the Irish sample. RESULTS: Published norms did not prove useful in improving screening accuracy. Cut-points based on 10th percentile Irish norms and the <23 cut-point performed comparably well, both yielding 93% specificity, with overall accuracy of 90% and 91% respectively (as sensitivity was higher for the <23 cut-point). CONCLUSIONS: Locally-derived norms yielded better screening accuracy than did published norms or the traditional <24 cut-point. The importance of selecting an appropriate percentile cut-off when using norms is discussed. The best results were obtained with a simple <23 cut-point, and this may be optimal when screening for dementia in an Irish community setting. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Breda Cullen; Brian O'Neill; Jonathan J Evans; Robert F Coen; Brian A Lawlor Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-12-18 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Joanna E McHugh Power; Linnea Sjöberg; Frank Kee; Rose Ann Kenny; Brian Lawlor Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: R Romero-Ortuno; A-M Casey; C U Cunningham; S Squires; D Prendergast; R A Kenny; B A Lawlor Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Adrienne T Aiken Morgan; Michael Marsiske; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Richard N Jones; Keith E Whitfield; Kathy E Johnson; Mary K Cresci Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.645