Literature DB >> 15798413

Impact of a double-pigtail stent on ureteral peristalsis in the porcine model: initial studies using a novel implantable magnetic sensor.

Ramakrishna Venkatesh1, Jaime Landman, Scott D Minor, David I Lee, Jamil Rehman, Richard Vanlangendonck, Maged Ragab, Kevin Morrissey, Chandru P Sundaram, Ralph V Clayman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The effect of stents on ureteral peristalsis in vivo is not entirely clear. We sought to develop a minimally invasive method for its study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In female domestic pigs, electrical potentials from the ureter were measured by bipolar steel-wire electromyography electrodes delivered laparoscopically. Mechanical movement was measured by giant magneto resistive sensors mounted on custom-made aluminum strips. After baseline values were obtained, the animals were randomized to receive silicone or polyurethane stents, and ureteral peristalsis was measured for 8 hours acutely and for 4 hours 1 week later.
RESULTS: Implantation of the devices took an average of 30 minutes. A consistent correlation was found between laparoscopically observed peristaltic waves and the peristalsis detected by the two measuring devices. The devices themselves did not affect peristalsis. Stent insertion increased peristaltic activity initially but later reduced or stopped it. There was no difference in the effects of the two types of stents.
CONCLUSIONS: The new technique permits close monitoring of ureteral peristalsis in vivo. Smaller stents appear to have less immediate effect than larger ones, but all type of stents tested eventually caused aperistalsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798413     DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ureteral stent-associated complications--where we are and where we are going.

Authors:  Dirk Lange; Samir Bidnur; Nathan Hoag; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Freeze-casting porous chitosan ureteral stents for improved drainage.

Authors:  Kaiyang Yin; Prajan Divakar; Ulrike G K Wegst
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 3.  Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo-A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative.

Authors:  Noor Buchholz; Alberto Budia; Julia de la Cruz; Wolfgang Kram; Owen Humphreys; Meital Reches; Raquel Valero Boix; Federico Soria
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Incidence of urinary extravasation and rate of ureteral stenting after high-grade renal trauma in adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sorena Keihani; Ross E Anderson; Michelle Fiander; Mary M McFarland; Gregory J Stoddard; James M Hotaling; Jeremy B Myers
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05

5.  The accumulation of particles in ureteric stents is mediated by flow dynamics: Full-scale computational and experimental modeling of the occluded and unoccluded ureter.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Aravinthan Vijayakumar; Maryam Mosayebi; Dirk Lange; Bhaskar K Somani; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2022-05-05

6.  Effect of smooth muscle relaxant drugs on proximal human ureteric activity in vivo: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-05-26

7.  After urgent drainage of an obstructed kidney by internal ureteric stenting; is ureteroscopic stone extraction always needed?

Authors:  Diaa-Eldin Taha; Ahmed M Elshal; Mohamed H Zahran; Ahmed M Harraz; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-10-20

8.  Percutaneous and transurethral lithotripsy for forgotten ureteral stents.

Authors:  Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-03-30

9.  Fluid Structural Analysis of Urine Flow in a Stented Ureter.

Authors:  J Carlos Gómez-Blanco; F Javier Martínez-Reina; Domingo Cruz; J Blas Pagador; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Federico Soria
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.