Literature DB >> 15798325

Artefacts in the analysis of temporal response functions measured by photon counting.

Goro Nishimura1, Mamoru Tamura.   

Abstract

The least-squares (LS) method in fluorescence decay analyses and in time-domain analyses of the diffuse scattering light for data measured by the time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) technique is experimentally evaluated, and the artefact in LS analysis for data with different counting statistics is discussed. In single exponential decay analysis, the error of the decay parameter by the LS method is smaller than 10% of the expected true value when the average number of counts per bin (N/k) is more than 1, and the fitting region covers a period on the order of the decay time. In multi-exponential analysis, the decay parameters are sensitively dependent on the counting statistics. In contrast, the fitting by the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), assuming Poissonian statistics, greatly reduces such dependence of parameters on the counting statistics. In another application, time-domain diffuse scattering measurements, the LS method is only accurate at N/k > 50 (10% error in the absorption coefficient). In particular, the absorption coefficient is largely dependent on the count. In both examples, the problem of stability in the fitting process by MLE still remains: the convergence of the fitting is critically dependent on the selection of initial guesses of the parameters in contrast to the convergence in the LS method. Thus, a hybrid method using the LS method for the determination of the initial guesses is a practical solution to this problem.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798325     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/6/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Efficient maximum likelihood estimator fitting of histograms.

Authors:  Ted A Laurence; Brett A Chromy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Effect of polystyrene microsphere surface to fluorescence lifetime under two-photon excitation.

Authors:  Marko E Tirri; Rina Wahlroos; Niko J Meltola; Juha Toivonen; Pekka E Hänninen
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  The coordination of spindle-positioning forces during the asymmetric division of the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote.

Authors:  Hélène Bouvrais; Laurent Chesneau; Yann Le Cunff; Danielle Fairbrass; Nina Soler; Sylvain Pastezeur; Thierry Pécot; Charles Kervrann; Jacques Pécréaux
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Robust Bayesian Fluorescence Lifetime Estimation, Decay Model Selection and Instrument Response Determination for Low-Intensity FLIM Imaging.

Authors:  Mark I Rowley; Anthonius C C Coolen; Borivoj Vojnovic; Paul R Barber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: fundamentals and advances in instrumentation, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Rupsa Datta; Tiffany M Heaster; Joe T Sharick; Amani A Gillette; Melissa C Skala
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Label-free metabolic and structural profiling of dynamic biological samples using multimodal optical microscopy with sensorless adaptive optics.

Authors:  Rishyashring R Iyer; Janet E Sorrells; Lingxiao Yang; Eric J Chaney; Darold R Spillman; Brian E Tibble; Carlos A Renteria; Haohua Tu; Mantas Žurauskas; Marina Marjanovic; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Lifetime-based analysis of binary fluorophores mixtures in the low photon count limit.

Authors:  Maisa Nasser; Amit Meller
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.