Literature DB >> 15798264

A comparison of Monte Carlo dose calculation denoising techniques.

I El Naqa1, I Kawrakow, M Fippel, J V Siebers, P E Lindsay, M V Wickerhauser, M Vicic, K Zakarian, N Kauffmann, J O Deasy.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that Monte Carlo (MC) denoising techniques can reduce MC radiotherapy dose computation time significantly by preferentially eliminating statistical fluctuations ('noise') through smoothing. In this study, we compare new and previously published approaches to MC denoising, including 3D wavelet threshold denoising with sub-band adaptive thresholding, content adaptive mean-median-hybrid (CAMH) filtering, locally adaptive Savitzky-Golay curve-fitting (LASG), anisotropic diffusion (AD) and an iterative reduction of noise (IRON) method formulated as an optimization problem. Several challenging phantom and computed-tomography-based MC dose distributions with varying levels of noise formed the test set. Denoising effectiveness was measured in three ways: by improvements in the mean-square-error (MSE) with respect to a reference (low noise) dose distribution; by the maximum difference from the reference distribution and by the 'Van Dyk' pass/fail criteria of either adequate agreement with the reference image in low-gradient regions (within 2% in our case) or, in high-gradient regions, a distance-to-agreement-within-2% of less than 2 mm. Results varied significantly based on the dose test case: greater reductions in MSE were observed for the relatively smoother phantom-based dose distribution (up to a factor of 16 for the LASG algorithm); smaller reductions were seen for an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) head and neck case (typically, factors of 2-4). Although several algorithms reduced statistical noise for all test geometries, the LASG method had the best MSE reduction for three of the four test geometries, and performed the best for the Van Dyk criteria. However, the wavelet thresholding method performed better for the head and neck IMRT geometry and also decreased the maximum error more effectively than LASG. In almost all cases, the evaluated methods provided acceleration of MC results towards statistically more accurate results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798264     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/5/014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current status and new horizons in Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray CT scanners.

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Mohammad Reza Ay
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Improved efficiency in Monte Carlo simulation for passive-scattering proton therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos Méndez; J Perl; J Schümann; J Shin; H Paganetti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Framework for denoising Monte Carlo photon transport simulations using deep learning.

Authors:  Matin Raayai Ardakani; Leiming Yu; David Kaeli; Qianqian Fang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 4.  Radiomics in precision medicine for lung cancer.

Authors:  Julie Constanzo; Lise Wei; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

5.  Graphics processing units-accelerated adaptive nonlocal means filter for denoising three-dimensional Monte Carlo photon transport simulations.

Authors:  Yaoshen Yuan; Leiming Yu; Zafer Doğan; Qianqian Fang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  A phase space model of a Versa HD linear accelerator for application to Monte Carlo dose calculation in a real-time adaptive workflow.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Rahul Nilawar; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.243

7.  Commissioning a fast Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for lung cancer treatment planning.

Authors:  Jeff Craig; Mike Oliver; Adam Gladwish; Matt Mulligan; Jeff Chen; Eugene Wong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Recommended dose voxel size and statistical uncertainty parameters for precision of Monte Carlo dose calculation in stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Simon K Goodall; Martin A Ebert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.