Literature DB >> 15798250

Effect of body mass index (BMI) on estimation of extracellular volume (ECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients using segmental and whole body bioimpedance analysis.

Mary Carter1, Alice T Morris, Fansan Zhu, Wojciech Zaluska, Nathan W Levin.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether body mass index (BMI) influences the estimation of extracellular volume (ECV) in hemodialysis (HD) patients when using segmental bioimpedance analysis (SBIA) compared to wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance analysis (WBIA) during HD with ultrafiltration (UF). Twenty five HD patients (M:F 19:6,) were studied, and further subdivided into two groups of patients, one group with a high BMI (25 kg m-2) and the other with a low BMI (<25 kg m-2). Segmental (arm, trunk, leg) and wrist-to-ankle bioimpedance measurements on each patient were performed using a modified Xitron 4000B system (Xitron Technologies, San Diego, CA). No differences in extracellular resistance (R(E), ohms) between wrist-to-ankle (R(W)) and sum of segments (R(S)) were noted for either the high BMI (489.2+/-82 ohm versus 491.6+/-82 ohm, p=ns) or low BMI groups (560.8+/-77 ohm versus 557.5+/-75 ohm, p=ns). UF volume (UFV, liters) did not differ significantly between the groups (4.0+/-0.9 L versus 3.3+/-1.0 L, p=ns), but change in ECV (DeltaECV) differed not only between methods: WBIA versus SBIA in the high BMI group (2.74+/-1.1 L versus 3.64+/-1.4 L, p<0.001) and in the low BMI group (1.86+/-0.9 L versus 2.91+/-1.0 L, p<0.05) but also between the high and lower BMI groups with WBIA (2.74+/-1.1 L versus 1.86+/-0.9 L, p<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in SBIA between BMI groups. This study suggests that the segmental bioimpedance approach may more accurately reflect changes in ECV during HD with UF than whole body impedance measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798250     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  6 in total

1.  Determinants of augmentation of ECG QRS complexes and R waves in patients after hemodialysis.

Authors:  Abdenasser Drighil; John E Madias; Hanane El Mosalami; Nadia El Badaoui; Ahmed Bennis; Bahija Mouine; Wafae Fadili; Beenyouness Ramdani
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Physical methods for evaluating the nutrition status of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Daniele Marcelli; Peter Wabel; Sebastian Wieskotten; Annalisa Ciotola; Aileen Grassmann; Attilio Di Benedetto; Bernard Canaud
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Agreement of single- and multi-frequency bioimpedance measurements in hemodialysis patients: an ancillary study of the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Daily Trial.

Authors:  Jochen G Raimann; Samer R Abbas; Li Liu; Fansan Zhu; Brett Larive; Peter Kotanko; Nathan W Levin; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2014-11-07

4.  Extracellular resistance is sensitive to tissue sodium status; implications for bioimpedance-derived fluid volume parameters in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nicos Mitsides; Damien McHugh; Agnieszka Swiecicka; Roshni Mitra; Paul Brenchley; Geoff J M Parker; Sandip Mitra
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Development of a Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Spectroscopy Device for Body Composition Measurement.

Authors:  Thomas Cannon; JungHun Choi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Knee-to-knee Bioimpedance Measurements to Monitor Changes in Extracellular Fluid in Haemodynamic-unstable Patients During Dialysis.

Authors:  Abdul Hamid Ismail; Georg Schlieper; Marian Walter; Jürgen Floege; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Electr Bioimpedance       Date:  2019-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.