Harlan S Patterson1, Dale N Sponaugle. 1. Departments of Pediatrics and Radiology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 16000 Georgia Avenue, Washington, DC 20307, USA. harlan.patterson@na.amedd.army.mil
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine how physicians interpret the word infiltrate when it is used in a chest radiography report and if the word is helpful in the clinical management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent from participants was not required, and the study protocol was granted exempt status. One hundred sixty-five questionnaires were distributed, in conjunction with various physician meetings, at three separate nonaffiliated training hospitals. In the three-question survey, respondents were asked the definition of infiltrate, whether the term is helpful in guiding patient therapy, and whether it implies an etiology. The respondent demographic data obtained included date of graduation from medical school, amount of postgraduate training completed, primary or training specialty, and board or sub-board qualification. RESULTS: There were 151 physician respondents, 94 (62.3%) of whom were house staff members. One hundred fifteen (76%) responders chose bacterial pneumonia as a condition consistent with infiltrate. One hundred thirty (86.1%) respondents replied that infiltrate implied more than one pathophysiologic condition. Eighty-two (54.3%) of those surveyed thought infiltrate could mean any of six or more different pathophysiologic conditions, including nonspecific pneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, viral pneumonia, consolidation, or nonspecific interstitial process. The number of terms selected did not vary according to level of residency training (P = .23); however, there was a significant specialty-related difference in the number of terms selected (P = .018). Internists selected a median of 10 terms, while others selected a median of six. Only 54 (36%) respondents thought that the term infiltrate was helpful in patient care, and only five (3%) thought that the term implied an etiology. CONCLUSION: Infiltrate is a nonspecific and imprecise term when it is used as a radiograph descriptor, and use of this term does not usually enhance patient care.
PURPOSE: To determine how physicians interpret the word infiltrate when it is used in a chest radiography report and if the word is helpful in the clinical management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Informed consent from participants was not required, and the study protocol was granted exempt status. One hundred sixty-five questionnaires were distributed, in conjunction with various physician meetings, at three separate nonaffiliated training hospitals. In the three-question survey, respondents were asked the definition of infiltrate, whether the term is helpful in guiding patient therapy, and whether it implies an etiology. The respondent demographic data obtained included date of graduation from medical school, amount of postgraduate training completed, primary or training specialty, and board or sub-board qualification. RESULTS: There were 151 physician respondents, 94 (62.3%) of whom were house staff members. One hundred fifteen (76%) responders chose bacterial pneumonia as a condition consistent with infiltrate. One hundred thirty (86.1%) respondents replied that infiltrate implied more than one pathophysiologic condition. Eighty-two (54.3%) of those surveyed thought infiltrate could mean any of six or more different pathophysiologic conditions, including nonspecific pneumonia, interstitial pneumonia, viral pneumonia, consolidation, or nonspecific interstitial process. The number of terms selected did not vary according to level of residency training (P = .23); however, there was a significant specialty-related difference in the number of terms selected (P = .018). Internists selected a median of 10 terms, while others selected a median of six. Only 54 (36%) respondents thought that the term infiltrate was helpful in patient care, and only five (3%) thought that the term implied an etiology. CONCLUSION: Infiltrate is a nonspecific and imprecise term when it is used as a radiograph descriptor, and use of this term does not usually enhance patient care.
Authors: Anna M Bramley; Sandra S Chaves; Fatimah S Dawood; Saumil Doshi; Arthur Reingold; Lisa Miller; Kimberly Yousey-Hindes; Monica M Farley; Patricia Ryan; Ruth Lynfield; Joan Baumbach; Shelley Zansky; Nancy Bennett; Ann Thomas; William Schaffner; Lyn Finelli; Seema Jain Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Stephanie E Spottswood; Kevin Liaw; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Melissa A Hilmes; Paul E Moore; Barron Patterson; Heidi Chen; J Herman Kan Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2009-02-25
Authors: Mohamed A Elemraid; Michelle Muller; David A Spencer; Stephen P Rushton; Russell Gorton; Matthew F Thomas; Katherine M Eastham; Fiona Hampton; Andrew R Gennery; Julia E Clark Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennifer Tempest-Mitchell; Bryn Hilton; Benjamin M Davies; Aria Nouri; Peter J Hutchinson; Daniel J Scoffings; Richard J Mannion; Rikin Trivedi; Ivan Timofeev; John R Crawford; Douglas Hay; Rodney J Laing; Mark R N Kotter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240