Literature DB >> 15797956

Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles.

Sérgio Reis Soares1, Carlos Troncoso, Ernesto Bosch, Vicente Serra, Carlos Simón, José Remohí, Antonio Pellicer.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The impact of advancing age on uterine receptiveness has always been a concern of the medical establishment. Oocyte donation (OD) is the perfect model for ascertaining the extent of this relationship, but the literature is somewhat unreliable, mainly due to the limited samples on which the studies are based and insufficient control of important variables such as embryo quality.
SETTING: The present work was developed in a private infertility clinic. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively evaluate the results of 3089 OD cycles that ended up in a d 3 embryo transfer. Severe male factor infertility was an exclusion criterion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of patients' age on pregnancy, implantation, and miscarriage rates and obstetric outcome is analyzed, as is the relevance of endometrial thickness, serum estradiol levels, and duration of exogenous estrogen therapy to said rates.
RESULTS: Pregnancy and implantation rates are significantly reduced and miscarriage rate is significantly increased from 45 yr of age onward. Concerning obstetric outcome, incidences of hypertension, proteinuria, premature rupture of membranes, second- and third-trimester hemorrhage, and preterm delivery are higher and mean birth weight is lower in this age group. With regard to endometrial preparation, estrogen therapy lasting more than 7 wk is associated with reduced PR and IR (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of OD cycles and obstetric outcome are significantly worse when recipients are 45 yr of age or older. Concerning endometrial preparation, results are significantly worse when estrogen therapy lasts more than 7 wk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797956     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2004-2252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  17 in total

1.  Effects of men and recipients' age on the reproductive outcome of an oocyte donation program.

Authors:  Inmaculada Campos; Emilio Gómez; Ana Lucia Fernández-Valencia; José Landeras; Rafaela González; Pilar Coy; Joaquín Gadea
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Oocyte donation: a risk factor for pregnancy-induced hypertension: a meta-analysis and case series.

Authors:  Ulrich Pecks; Nicolai Maass; Joseph Neulen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  A combination of hydroxypropyl cellulose and trehalose as supplementation for vitrification of human oocytes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Aila Coello; Pilar Campos; José Remohí; Marcos Meseguer; Ana Cobo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Switching to testicular sperm after a previous ICSI failure with ejaculated sperm significantly improves blastocyst quality without increasing aneuploidy risk.

Authors:  Irene Hervas; Maria Gil Julia; Rocío Rivera-Egea; Ana Navarro-Gomezlechon; Laura Mossetti; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Is duration of estrogen supplementation associated with clinical outcomes in frozen-thawed autologous single-blastocyst transfer cycles?

Authors:  Xiaofang Li; Wenhao Shi; Yan'e Gao; Juanzi Shi; Na Li; Haiyan Bai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients.

Authors:  A Cobo; J Domingo; S Pérez; J Crespo; J Remohí; A Pellicer
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Lower follicular n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels are associated with a better response to ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  José-Ignacio Ruiz-Sanz; Irantzu Pérez-Ruiz; Susana Meijide; Marcos Ferrando; Zaloa Larreategui; María-Begoña Ruiz-Larrea
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Bone marrow-derived cells from male donors do not contribute to the endometrial side population of the recipient.

Authors:  Irene Cervelló; Claudia Gil-Sanchis; Aymara Mas; Amparo Faus; Jaime Sanz; Federico Moscardó; Gema Higueras; Miguel Angel Sanz; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program.

Authors:  Pooja Gupta; Manish Banker; Pravin Patel; Bhart Joshi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09

10.  Adverse obstetric outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a retrospective cohort case study in Sweden.

Authors:  Evangelia Elenis; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic; Alkistis Skalkidou; Helena Åkerud; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.