Literature DB >> 15797638

Economic benefits of substance abuse treatment: findings from Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

Lane Koenig1, Jonathan M Siegel, Henrick Harwood, Jawaria Gilani, Ying-Jun Chen, Peter Leahy, Richard Stephens.   

Abstract

We estimated long-term economic benefits and treatment costs for a sample of substance abuse clients who received treatment in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, using health, criminal activity, and earnings data from the Persistent Effects of Treatment Studies. Clients were interviewed at baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 30 months following baseline. We find positive benefits from substance abuse treatment, almost of all of which were derived from reduced criminal activity and increased real earnings, with overall benefit-to-cost ratios ranging from 2.8 to 4.1. The reductions in costs to society were found to be persistent over the long-term, 30-month follow-up period. On average, treatment was found to be cost beneficial regardless of the number of times a client entered treatment in the baseline or follow-up periods. Clients who entered residential treatment and then step down to less intensive care showed greater treatment benefits than clients who only received residential treatment.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797638     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat        ISSN: 0740-5472


  8 in total

1.  Individual and system influences on waiting time for substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Carey J A Carr; Jiangmin Xu; Cristina Redko; D Timothy Lane; Richard C Rapp; John Goris; Robert G Carlson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-05-23

2.  Lessons from five states: public sector use of the Washington Circle performance measures.

Authors:  Deborah W Garnick; Margaret T Lee; Constance Horgan; Andrea Acevedo; Michael Botticelli; Spencer Clark; Steven Davis; Robert Gallati; Karin Haberlin; Andrew Hanchett; Dawn Lambert-Wacey; Tracy Leeper; James Siemianowski; Minakshi Tikoo
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-01-22

3.  Co-occurring risk factors for arrest among persons with opioid abuse and dependence: implications for developing interventions to limit criminal justice involvement.

Authors:  William H Fisher; Robin Clark; Jeffrey Baxter; Bruce Barton; Elizabeth O'Connell; Gideon Aweh
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-06-14

4.  Benefits and costs associated with mutual-help community-based recovery homes: The Oxford House model.

Authors:  Anthony T Lo Sasso; Erik Byro; Leonard A Jason; Joseph R Ferrari; Bradley Olson
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2011-07-22

5.  The economic costs of quarterly monitoring and recovery management checkups for adults with chronic substance use disorders.

Authors:  Michael L Dennis; Michael T French; Kathryn E McCollister; Christy K Scott
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-04-05

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of interventions to treat opiate dependence : a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Christopher M Doran
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems.

Authors:  Deborah W Garnick; Margaret T Lee; Constance M Horgan; Andrea Acevedo
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-08-21

8.  A pilot economic evaluation of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder as an addition and alternative to traditional therapy.

Authors:  Corinne N Kacmarek; Brian T Yates; Charla Nich; Brian D Kiluk
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.455

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.