Literature DB >> 15797592

In vivo debonding strength and enamel damage in two orthodontic debonding methods.

Tamar Brosh1, Assaf Kaufman, Alex Balabanovsky, Alexander D Vardimon.   

Abstract

Bracket debonding strength related to diverse debonding methods and enamel damage has not been assessed in vivo. The study hypothetized a direct relationship between these three parameters. Debonding strength was measured clinically in the wings method and base method on 50 patients in a split mouth method using a calibrated debonding plier. Brackets from 30 of these patients were scanned in SEM and EDAX for adhesive remnant index and enamel calcium remnants. Base method debonding force was significantly greater than wings method (163.5+/-68.7 N, 106.1+/-66.2 N, respectively, p < 0.001). A positive adhesive remnant index score was found in both methods (68.7%, 66.7%, respectively). Debonding strength vs. adhesive remnant index or calcium index scores were not correlated. However, the latter two were significantly correlated (0.524 < R < 0.895, p < 0.031). Half of the debonding failures developed at the adhesive enamel interface. The results warnts the potential of enamel damage during debonding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  Orthodontic bracket debonding: risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Philipp Winterhalder; Nikola Holberg; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Periodontal ligament strain induced by different orthodontic bracket removal techniques: nonlinear finite-element comparison study.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson; Andrea Wichelhaus; Philipp Winterhalder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Bracket base remnants after orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Matteo Zanarini; Antonio Gracco; Monica Lattuca; Silvia Marchionni; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride incorporated phosphoric acid etchant on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Behnam Khosravanifard; Reyhaneh Yazdani; Hamid Rakhshan; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-10

5.  Prototype to measure bracket debonding force in vivo.

Authors:  Jéssika Lagni Tonus; Fernanda Borguetti Manfroi; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Eduardo Correa Grigolo; Sérgio Helegda; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017-02

6.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.

Authors:  Caöry Ulusoy
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Comparison of shear bond strength to clinically simulated debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Amal Ibrahim Linjawi; Mona A Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of enamel surface alteration resulting from orthodontic clean-up -comparison of three different tools.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Piotr Stępień; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Assessment of Bracket Surface Morphology and Dimensional Change.

Authors:  Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan; N K Sapna Varma; V V Ajith
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.