Literature DB >> 15797456

Evolving concepts in bone tissue engineering.

Catherine M Cowan1, Chia Soo, Kang Ting, Benjamin Wu.   

Abstract

The field of tissue engineering integrates the latest advances in molecular biology, biochemistry, engineering, material science, and medical transplantation. Researchers in the developing field of regenerative medicine have identified bone tissue engineering as an attractive translational target. Clinical problems requiring bone regeneration are diverse, and no single regeneration approach will likely resolve all defects. Recent advances in the field of tissue engineering have included the use of sophisticated biocompatible scaffolds, new postnatal multipotent cell populations, and the appropriate cellular stimulation. In particular, synthetic polymer scaffolds allow for fast and reproducible construction, while still retaining biocompatible characteristics. These criteria relate to the immediate goal of determining the ideal implant. The search is becoming a reality with widespread availability of biocompatible scaffolds; however, the desired parameters have not been clearly defined. Currently, most research focuses on the use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), specifically BMP-2 and BMP-7. These proteins induce osteogenic differentiation in vitro, as well as bone defect healing in vivo. Protein-scaffold interactions that enhance BMP binding are of the utmost importance, since prolonged BMP release creates the most osteogenic microenvironment. Transition into clinical studies has had only mild success and relies on large doses of BMPs for bone formation. Advances within the field of bone tissue engineering will likely overcome these challenges and lead to more clinically relevant therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797456     DOI: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)66008-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol        ISSN: 0070-2153            Impact factor:   4.897


  18 in total

1.  Biphasic peptide amphiphile nanomatrix embedded with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for stimulated osteoinductive response.

Authors:  Joel M Anderson; Jessica L Patterson; Jeremy B Vines; Amjad Javed; Shawn R Gilbert; Ho-Wook Jun
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  In vitro evaluation of macroporous hydrogels to facilitate stem cell infiltration, growth, and mineralization.

Authors:  Vandana Keskar; Nicholas W Marion; Jeremy J Mao; Richard A Gemeinhart
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Effect of scaffold architecture and BMP-2/BMP-7 delivery on in vitro bone regeneration.

Authors:  Pinar Yilgor; Rui A Sousa; Rui L Reis; Nesrin Hasirci; Vasif Hasirci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Nell-1-induced bone regeneration in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Tara Aghaloo; Catherine M Cowan; Yu-Fen Chou; Xinli Zhang; Haofu Lee; Steve Miao; Nichole Hong; Shun'ichi Kuroda; Benjamin Wu; Kang Ting; Chia Soo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Segmental bone regeneration using a load-bearing biodegradable carrier of bone morphogenetic protein-2.

Authors:  Tien-Min G Chu; Stuart J Warden; Charles H Turner; Rena L Stewart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Inkjet-based biopatterning of bone morphogenetic protein-2 to spatially control calvarial bone formation.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Eric D Miller; Gary E Decesare; Arvydas Usas; Emily L Lensie; Michael R Bykowski; Johnny Huard; Lee E Weiss; Joseph E Losee; Phil G Campbell
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Ethyl-3,4-dihydroxybenzoate with a dual function of induction of osteogenic differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast differentiation for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Byeong-Ju Kwon; Mi Hee Lee; Min-Ah Koo; Jae-Jin Han; Jong-Chul Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Ultra-porous titanium oxide scaffold with high compressive strength.

Authors:  Hanna Tiainen; S Petter Lyngstadaas; Jan Eirik Ellingsen; Håvard J Haugen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Comparative study of bone repair using porous hydroxyapatite/ β-tricalcium phosphate and xenograft scaffold in rabbits with tibia defect.

Authors:  Zohreh Bagher; Farzad Rajaei; Mohammadali Shokrgozar
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2012

10.  Postoperative lumbar spinal stenosis after intertransverse fusion with granules of hydroxyapatite: a case report.

Authors:  Gen Inoue; Seiji Ohtori; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Toshinori Ito; Morihiro Higashi; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Sumihisa Orita; Junichi Nakamura; Tomoaki Toyone; Masashi Takaso; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.