Literature DB >> 15797168

A comparison of methods for measuring cognitive change in older adults.

Robert J Frerichs1, Holly A Tuokko.   

Abstract

Well-researched statistical methods are required to guide clinicians in determining the significance of test score changes in serial neuropsychological assessment of older adults. The following six change score methods were examined using five-year test-retest data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging: the standard deviation method, three reliable change indices (RCIs), and two standardized regression-based methods. Changes in scores on four memory measures were examined in cognitively healthy older adults, and the RCI with a correction for practice/aging effects most accurately classified this normal variability. Diagnostic change (i.e., developing dementia versus remaining cognitive healthy) was also examined in relation to memory test score changes. All change score methods were significantly associated with diagnostic change, though the strength of association varied by measure and method. In contrast to some previous research, RCIs were found to be useful when making diagnostic discriminations in older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15797168     DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  39 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: relevant concepts and methods.

Authors:  Kevin Duff
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Lifestyle and genetic contributions to cognitive decline and hippocampal structure and function in healthy aging.

Authors:  John L Woodard; Michael A Sugarman; Kristy A Nielson; J Carson Smith; Michael Seidenberg; Sally Durgerian; Alissa Butts; Nathan Hantke; Melissa Lancaster; Monica A Matthews; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Cognition level and change in cognition during adolescence are associated with cognition in midlife.

Authors:  Golareh Agha; Katrina Kezios; Andrea A Baccarelli; F DuBois Bowman; Virginia Rauh; Ezra S Susser; Barbara Cohn; Piera Cirillo; Bruce G Link; Pam Factor-Litvak; Ursula M Staudinger
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Measuring cognitive change in older adults: reliable change indices for the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  A Hensel; M C Angermeyer; S G Riedel-Heller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Implications of within-person variability in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning for the interpretation of change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  External validation of change formulae in neuropsychology with neuroimaging biomarkers: A methodological recommendation and preliminary clinical data.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Kayla R Suhrie; Bonnie C A Dalley; Jeffrey S Anderson; John M Hoffman
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Predicting cognitive change in older adults: the relative contribution of practice effects.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; David J Moser; Jane S Paulsen; Susan K Schultz; Stephan Arndt
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Determining the Presence of Reliable Change over Time in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence from the PASAT, Adjusting-PSAT, and Stroop Test.

Authors:  Suzanne L Barker-Collo; Suzanne C Purdy
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2013

9.  An evaluation of analytical approaches for understanding change in cognition in the context of aging and health.

Authors:  Andrea M Piccinin; Graciela Muniz; Catharine Sparks; Daniel E Bontempo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Implications of short-term retest effects for the interpretation of longitudinal change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Elliot M Tucker-Drob
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.