Literature DB >> 15796963

Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization.

Yasuhiro Tsubosa1, Hiroyuki Sugihara, Ken-Ichi Mukaisho, Sumihiro Kamitani, Dun-Fa Peng, Zhi-Qiang Ling, Tohru Tani, Takanori Hattori.   

Abstract

Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) is often applied to small amounts of DNA from microdissected tissues in the analyses of chromosomal copy number with comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The sensitivity and specificity in CGH analyses largely depend on the unbiased amplification and labeling of probe DNA, and the sensitivity and specificity should be high enough to detect one-copy changes in aneuploid cancer cells when accurate assessment of chromosomal instability is needed. The present study was designed to assess the effects of DOP-PCR and labeling method on the sensitivity of metaphase- and array-based CGHs in the detection of one-copy changes in near-tetraploid Kato-III cells. By focusing on several chromosomes whose absolute copy numbers were determined by FISH, we first compared the green-to-red ratio profiles of metaphase- and array-based CGH to the absolute copy numbers using the DNA diluted with varying proportions of lymphocyte DNA, with and without prior DOP-PCR amplification, and found that the amplification process scarcely affected the sensitivity but gave slightly lower specificity. Second, we compared random priming (RP) labeling with nick translation (NT) labeling and found that the RP labeling gave fewer false-positive gains and fewer false-negative losses in the detection of one-copy changes. In array CGH, locus-by-locus concordance between the DNAs with and without DOP-PCR amplification was high (nearly 100%) in the gain of three copies or more and the loss of two copies or more. This suggests that we could pinpoint the candidate genes within large-shift losses-gains that are detected with array CGH in microdissected tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15796963     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  5 in total

1.  Defining ploidy-specific thresholds in array comparative genomic hybridization to improve the sensitivity of detection of single copy alterations in cell lines.

Authors:  Grace Ng; Jingxiang Huang; Ian Roberts; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Lineage analysis of early and advanced tubular adenocarcinomas of the stomach: continuous or discontinuous?

Authors:  Takahisa Nakayama; Zhi-Qiang Ling; Ken-ichi Mukaisho; Takanori Hattori; Hiroyuki Sugihara
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Comparative genomic hybridization: DNA labeling, hybridization and detection.

Authors:  Richard Redon; Tomas Fitzgerald; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  A robust method to analyze copy number alterations of less than 100 kb in single cells using oligonucleotide array CGH.

Authors:  Birte Möhlendick; Christoph Bartenhagen; Bianca Behrens; Ellen Honisch; Katharina Raba; Wolfram T Knoefel; Nikolas H Stoecklein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The development of a mini-array for estimating the disease state of gastric adenocarcinoma by array CGH.

Authors:  Tomoko Furuya; Tetsuji Uchiyama; Atsushi Adachi; Takae Okada; Motonao Nakao; Atsunori Oga; Song-Ju Yang; Shigeto Kawauchi; Kohsuke Sasaki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.